2022
DOI: 10.5751/ace-02105-170126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with automated detection of Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) four-note location calls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, low quality refers to recordings with a low signal‐to‐noise ratio, which can result from owls vocalizing far away from the ARU, low call volume, high background noise, or topographic interference. There is a distance threshold at which calls become unidentifiable (Hane et al, 2022; Maegawa et al, 2021). Nevertheless, the Dale et al (2022) model performed well for calls that were clear enough to generate predictions and offers a valuable step that can be integrated into a workflow for processing acoustic recordings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, low quality refers to recordings with a low signal‐to‐noise ratio, which can result from owls vocalizing far away from the ARU, low call volume, high background noise, or topographic interference. There is a distance threshold at which calls become unidentifiable (Hane et al, 2022; Maegawa et al, 2021). Nevertheless, the Dale et al (2022) model performed well for calls that were clear enough to generate predictions and offers a valuable step that can be integrated into a workflow for processing acoustic recordings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This covariate was represented by an index (0–1) of how similar a given cell (30 × 30 m) was to other areas with known spotted owl NR sites based on tree species composition and structural factors. For the survey‐level covariate on detection probability, we used the mean suitability value in cells within a 200‐m buffer of each station to approximate a likely listening distance of the ARUs (Hane et al, 2022; Maegawa et al, 2021; Wood et al, 2021) while minimizing the amount of overlap between station buffers (Appendix S2: Figure S1). For the hexagon‐level covariate on occupancy, we used the mean suitability value within a 500‐m buffer around each ARU station, unionized to create a single footprint per hexagon (Appendix S2: Figure S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%