Factors associated with adverse obstetric events following induction of labour: a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in Ghana

Adu‐Bonsaffoh, Kwame; Seffah, J.D.

doi:10.4314/ahs.v22i4.40

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…KBTH is Ghana’s largest hospital and a tertiary referral center conducting approximately 10,000 deliveries annually. Induction of labour accounts for significant proportions of deliveries in the hospital [ 5 ]. Generally, IOL is initiated by the medical doctors at the hospital and the midwives actively monitor the maternal and fetal conditions to ensure early detection and treatment of complications.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Labour induction is usually undertaken when the risk of pregnancy prolongation till the natural labour onset outweighs the risk of immediate delivery. Recognized indications for IOL include prolonged pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes and medical conditions in pregnancy such as diabetes, pre-eclampsia and sickle cell disease [3][4][5]. However, IOL, in itself, is associated with significant maternal and perinatal risk.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lived experiences of women during induction of labour at a tertiary hospital in Ghana: A qualitative study

Atobrah-Apraku,

Newman,

Opuni-Frimpong

et al. 2024

PLOS Glob Public Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Induction of labour (IOL) has become a major and vital maternal health intervention to facilitate childbirth and minimize the rising caesarean section rates globally. However, there is limited information to facilitate appropriate client counselling, birth preparedness and informed decision making although the procedure has inherent tendency for adverse maternal/perinatal outcomes. Given the need for optimal client education and shared decision making in maternal health, this study explored women’s knowledge and their lived experiences of IOL. This qualitative study used in-depth interviews, conducted at the largest teaching hospital in Ghana. Purposive sampling was used to recruit the study participants. Data analysis was performed based on thematic content using inductive framework synthesis. We included 17 women who had undergone IOL, delivered and discharged. Most participants(52.9%) were ≥30 years old, married(88.2%), and 41.1% had no previous childbirth experience. The main indications of IOL were postdate(47%), pre-eclampsia(29%) and gestational diabetes mellitus(11.8%). Data synthesis resulted in three broad themes: women’s knowledge on IOL, women’s experiences of care and women’s difficult experiences including coping mechanisms. We determined mixed responses concerning the themes explored: adequate versus inadequate knowledge; positive versus negative experiences of care and satisfaction. Nearly all women mentioned vaginal examination as their most difficult experience due to severe pain, extreme discomfort, and being psychologically traumatic. The main coping strategy the women developed to navigate the traumatic vaginal examination was by “psyching” themselves. Our study indicates women encounter significant negative and positive experiences during IOL and childbirth in Ghana with vaginal examination cited as the most painful experience. Appropriate antenatal counselling, women empowerment and pre-labour education on childbirth processes and expectations are recommended to enhance birth preparedness and complication awareness. Health system improvement and regular refreshers courses for health workers are urgently required to promote positive women’s experiences of care during labour induction and childbirth.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%