2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01292.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with adherence to and biofilm formation on polystyrene byStenotrophomonas maltophilia: the role of cell surface hydrophobicity and motility

Abstract: We tested 40 clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains to investigate the possible correlation between adherence to and formation of biofilm on polystyrene, and cell surface properties such as hydrophobicity and motility. Most of the strains were able to adhere and form biofilm, although striking differences were observed. Eleven (27.5%) of the strains were hydrophobic, with hydrophobicity greatly increasing as S. maltophilia attached to the substratum. A positive correlation was observed between hydrophob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
89
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(34 reference statements)
5
89
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Roosjen et al (2006) observed that the motility and zeta potential were not distinctive for adhesive and non-adhesive strains, and could therefore not be the reason for the difference in adhesion behavior. In other study, no correlation between motility, adhesion and biofilm formation was found (Pompilio et al 2008). Also, those authors found a strong relationship between the extent of initial adhesion of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to PS surfaces and biofilm formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Roosjen et al (2006) observed that the motility and zeta potential were not distinctive for adhesive and non-adhesive strains, and could therefore not be the reason for the difference in adhesion behavior. In other study, no correlation between motility, adhesion and biofilm formation was found (Pompilio et al 2008). Also, those authors found a strong relationship between the extent of initial adhesion of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to PS surfaces and biofilm formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly to other studies, PS was used as a model surface for adhesion and biofilm formation under laboratorial conditions (Simões et al 2007b;Pompilio et al 2008;Silva et al 2008;Johansen et al 2009). The PS microtiter plates are commonly used as the standard bioreactor system for adhesion and biofilm formation of bacteria isolated from many different environments, providing reliable comparative data (Djordjevic et al 2002;Andersson et al 2008;Cotter et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing that adhesion and morphological transition are two important stages for C. albicans biofilm formation (42) and that there is a positive correlation between CSH and adhesion of C. albicans (43)(44)(45), we first examined the effect of PTE on CSH of C. albicans. The normal CSH of C. albicans was found to be 0.67 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since adhesion and morphological transition are two important stages for C. albicans biofilm formation (14) and there is a positive correlation between cellular surface hydrophobicity (CSH) and adhesion (15)(16)(17), we investigated the influence of SAN on CSH of C. albicans. The normal relative CSH of C. albicans was about 89.9% (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%