2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Associated With 20-Year Cumulative Risk of Infection After Aseptic Index Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Truncating the follow-up data at 2 years would have increased the number of patients, but at the cost of missing relevant changes in KSS. In addition, a longer follow-up gives patients more relevant expectations regarding the clinical process [23]. Before integrating this prediction rule in daily practice, the prediction rule needs to be externally validated, and important determinants such as BMI, smoking and diabetes mellitus should be taken into consideration as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Truncating the follow-up data at 2 years would have increased the number of patients, but at the cost of missing relevant changes in KSS. In addition, a longer follow-up gives patients more relevant expectations regarding the clinical process [23]. Before integrating this prediction rule in daily practice, the prediction rule needs to be externally validated, and important determinants such as BMI, smoking and diabetes mellitus should be taken into consideration as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of patient-related factors have been identified that play an important role in predicting rTKA outcome, such as age, race, body mass index, and diabetic status [9, 10, 22, 23, 26]. In addition, severe stiffness (formerly referred to as arthrofibrosis) as main reason for revision resulted in a worse outcome compared to other reasons for revision like instability, infection and malposition [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is there harm in treating all potential crystalline arthropathies after TKA as if they were infected? Potential risks of unnecessary operative intervention include increased cost [39], exposure to anesthetic, particularly if comorbidities are present [40], the psychosocial burden to the patient [41], and the risk of introducing infection into an aseptic knee, as revision surgery has been shown to carry increased infection risk [42,43]. On the contrary, delaying operative debridement of PJI may result in a missed window of opportunity for retention of nonmodular components, resulting in a more invasive 1-or 2-stage exchange.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial baseline infection rates following revision TKA were obtained from the literature, ranging between 5 and 21% depending on the indication for revision. 5,7 We chose to use an infection rate of 9.0%, 5 as this infection rate represents the published overall deep infection rate following revision TKA and is within previously reported ranges. Furthermore, this infection rate is on the lower end of the spectrum and a low initial infection rate requires the proposed infection prevention strategy to have a greater relative impact to remain costeffective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%