2013
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2013.824086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors and processes of permanent gully evolution in a Mediterranean marly environment (Cape Bon, Tunisia)

Abstract: Gully erosion is considered to be one of the most important soil erosion processes in Mediterranean marly environments, but its actual contribution to total soil loss is still under discussion. The objectives of this paper are: (a) to acquire the distributed value of erosion rate in a permanent gully developed on a marly substratum in a Mediterranean environment; and (b) to quantify the key factors responsible for the spatial and temporal differences in erosion rates observed within the gully. A permanent gull… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra‐annual evolution of vegetation cover was reported by Raclot and Albergel (2006) and intra‐annual evolution of cracks by Inoubli et al (2016). An intensive topographic monitoring of a representative permanent gully (included in P2+G) was also conducted in Kamech between 2002 and 2009 using a total station (El Khalili et al, 2013). This monitoring enabled us to estimate the long‐term mean interannual gully erosion rate in Kamech at 80 t ha −1 yr −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intra‐annual evolution of vegetation cover was reported by Raclot and Albergel (2006) and intra‐annual evolution of cracks by Inoubli et al (2016). An intensive topographic monitoring of a representative permanent gully (included in P2+G) was also conducted in Kamech between 2002 and 2009 using a total station (El Khalili et al, 2013). This monitoring enabled us to estimate the long‐term mean interannual gully erosion rate in Kamech at 80 t ha −1 yr −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, α and β were quantified through a combination of aerial photograph interpretation and field surveys, whereas long‐term topsoil ( E Topsoil ) and gully ( E Gullies ) erosion rates were assumed to be known and representative of any parts of the Kamech catchment. In this study, E Topsoil was set to the measured erosion rate between 2005 and 2012 at the experimental plot P1 (Es_P1, this study) and E Gullies was set to 80 t ha −1 yr −1 as estimated by El Khalili et al (2013). Erosion from dwellings and scrublands was assumed to be negligible because (i) dwellings are located in the northeastern part of the catchment, which is a very flat area, (ii) most of dwellings are sedimentologically disconnected from the catchment by dense vegetative hedges at their edges that are used as animal enclosures and field fence, and (iii) the scrublands are located on sandstone outcrops that represent <10% of the catchment area and don't show field evidence of important erosion activities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evaluation was based on a profile comparison of the kite DEM with a reference DEM derived from an intensive field topographic survey of a mid-size gully. This reference DEM was calculated on a 0.05 by 0.05 m grid from a very dense point data set acquired in 2009 using a total station that had an (X, Y, Z) accuracy better than 0.01 m (Khalili et al, 2013). Standard statistics on the deviation between the kite DEM and the reference DEM were derived on an elevation profile of a path composed of a series of line segments.…”
Section: Gully 3-d Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method does not allow the analysis of the gully channel's development. The second method is based on the use of topographic data sets, DEM, digital surface models (DSM) or point cloud (PC) [46][47][48] and aims to define the evolution of the morphological characteristics of a gully over a period of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%