1990
DOI: 10.1179/095066090790323966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting variable weld penetration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the power waveform), 38) the surface tension of the molten pool, 8) and the direction of the molten metal flow (Marangoni flow). 35,39,40) Therefore, the content of the weld porosity depends on the factors which trap the bubbles and enhance the bubble floatability.…”
Section: Analysis Of Porosity Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the power waveform), 38) the surface tension of the molten pool, 8) and the direction of the molten metal flow (Marangoni flow). 35,39,40) Therefore, the content of the weld porosity depends on the factors which trap the bubbles and enhance the bubble floatability.…”
Section: Analysis Of Porosity Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical studies supplemented with experimental investigations suggest that the weld penetration is dominated by surface tension temperature gradients over the pool [1,2]. The presence of some surface-active species that increase the melt surface tension with temperature induces thermo-capillary flows deep into the weld and results in deeper penetrations.…”
Section: Flux For Tig Welding Efficiency Improvements: Atig (Activatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He considered that hydraulic jump occurred when molten metal wall jet velocity exceeded a critical value, thus led to humping. Mills and Keene [5] regarded Marangoni convection force as the reason for the humping phenomenon. Arc pressure model was firstly proposed by Paton et al [6] who considered that a balance of pressure exists between arc and weld pool and hump occurred when arc pressure became larger than the metal pressure during SAW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%