Factors affecting the success of next‐generation sequencing in cytology specimens

Abstract

BACKGROUND:The use of cytology specimens for next-generation sequencing (NGS) is particularly challenging because of the unconventional substrate of smears and the often limited sample volume. An analysis of factors affecting NGS testing in cytologic samples may help to increase the frequency of successful testing. METHODS: This study reviewed variables associated with all in-house cytology cases (n 5 207) that were analyzed by NGS with the Ion Torrent platform during a 10-month interval. A statistical analysis was performed to measure the effects of the DNA input threshold, specimen preparation, slide type, tumor fraction, DNA yield, and cytopathologist bias. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four of 207 cases (79%) were successfully sequenced by NGS; 43 (21%) failed because of either a low DNA yield or a template/library preparation failure. The median estimated tumor fraction and DNA concentration for the successfully sequenced cases were 70% and 2.5 ng/lL, respectively, whereas they were 60% and 0.2 ng/lL, respectively, for NGS failures. Cell block sections were tested in 91 cases, and smears were used in 116 cases. NGS success positively correlated with the DNA yield but not the tumor fraction. Cell block preparations showed a higher success rate than smears. Frosted-tip slides yielded significantly more DNA than fully frosted slides. Lowering the input DNA concentration below the manufacturer's recommended threshold of 10 ng (>0.85 ng/lL) resulted in a marked increase in the NGS success rate from 58.6% to 89.8%. CONCLUSIONS:The failure of NGS with cytology samples is usually a result of suboptimal DNA due to multiple pre-analytical factors.Knowledge of these factors will allow better selection of cytology material for mutational analysis. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:659-68.

Diff-Quik Cytology Smears from Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Specimens as a Source of DNA for Next-Generation Sequencing Instead of Cell Blocks

“…Some previous studies have looked at workflow options for NGS [41-43]. One study of cytology samples [44] showed that from 207 FNA samples, there was overall NGS success in 79% of cases.…”

Use of Exfoliative Specimens and Fine-Needle Aspiration Smears for Mutation Testing in Lung Adenocarcinoma

“…A review of 22 studies showed that cytologic samples that contain EGFR mutations are in the range of 6-50.46%, with an average of 20% [16] ; the highest failure rate is with sputum samples.…”

“…Several recent publications regarding the use of cytological specimens in molecular testing of lung cancer have been published [3, 5-7, 13, 14] . Although these studies have shown that molecular testing can be performed successfully with cytological specimens, there are unique challenges posed by the variety of specimens in cytology and the different protocols of specimen collection and processing, including fixation, mounting medium, and staining [3,9,15,16] .…”

Expectations and Projections for the Future of Nongynecolgical Cytology 10 Years Ago: Did They Materialize and How Did We Do?

“…However, with the adoption of sophisticated technologies, this problem is increasingly being addressed and nowadays, more and more cytopathologists and cytotechnologists are becoming aware about the needs of a proper collection and preservation of the material as well as the need for the standardization of techniques [3,14] .…”

“…They were, indeed, completely right. In 2017, morphology still is the cornerstone for diagnosis in cytopathology and, even with the huge advances in molecular genetics in the last decade, the success of these latter techniques depends on a good qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the cytologic material [3] .…”