2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting the study of important marketing issues: Implications and recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Harter (1992, p. 603) states that “a phenomenon that is relevant changes the matter in some way; it adds information, or decreases information, offers a new perspective, or causes other kinds of cognitive change.” In discourse theory, relevance refers to a linguistic discourse that produces change in knowledge and assumptions (Wilson and Sperber 2004). The impact (or change) view of relevance is also central to Jaworski’s (2011, p. 212) definition of managerial relevance as “the degree to which a specific manager in an organization perceives academic knowledge to aid his or her job-related thoughts or actions in the pursuit of organizational goals.” Relatedly, some authors distinguish relevance from importance (Kohli and Haenlein 2021; Stremersch 2021). They suggest operationalizing importance by the number and status of stakeholders who are likely to change their behavior as well as the magnitude of the expected change (Kohli and Haenlein 2021).…”
Section: The Case For Measuring Relevance To Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Harter (1992, p. 603) states that “a phenomenon that is relevant changes the matter in some way; it adds information, or decreases information, offers a new perspective, or causes other kinds of cognitive change.” In discourse theory, relevance refers to a linguistic discourse that produces change in knowledge and assumptions (Wilson and Sperber 2004). The impact (or change) view of relevance is also central to Jaworski’s (2011, p. 212) definition of managerial relevance as “the degree to which a specific manager in an organization perceives academic knowledge to aid his or her job-related thoughts or actions in the pursuit of organizational goals.” Relatedly, some authors distinguish relevance from importance (Kohli and Haenlein 2021; Stremersch 2021). They suggest operationalizing importance by the number and status of stakeholders who are likely to change their behavior as well as the magnitude of the expected change (Kohli and Haenlein 2021).…”
Section: The Case For Measuring Relevance To Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that marketing is an applied discipline, articles published in academic journals should fulfill marketing practitioners’ informational needs and be relevant to marketing practice. However, many articles do not seem to present relevant and important insights and findings that impact business practice (Jaworski 2011; Kohli and Haenlein 2021; Kumar 2017; Stremersch, Winer, and Camacho 2021; Van Heerde et al 2021). Prominent marketing scholars, including the founders of the annual Theory and Practice in Marketing (TPM) conference, have noted that “many observers complain that academia is far removed from addressing substantive problems of industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In past, a lot of work has been reported in the area of Quality and Marketing separately. According to Kohli and Haenlein (2020), Marketing is such a subject that rapidly changes from time to time because of emergence of new concepts and technologies, so, there is a need for researches that tackle different issues with an entirely different and creative approach. On the other side, majority work in Quality discipline is on healthcare, higher education institutions (HEIs), construction, manufacturing, automobile, agriculture, pharmaceutical industry and banking sector.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…129-143 menghasilkan sejumlah teori, kerangka kerja, model dan alat pengambilan keputusan. (Kohli & Haenlein, 2020). Misalnya penelitian Howard & Sheth (1970) membahas pemasaran dari sisi membangun teori perilaku pembeli; Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry (1985) mengembangkan teori kualitas layanan; Tuli, Kohli, & Bharadwaj (2007) mengusulkan pandangan baru tentang solusi pelanggan; Srivastava, Shervani, & Fahey, (1998) mengembangkan kerangka kerja yang menghubungkan manajemen aset berbasis pasar dengan nilai pemegang saham; Guadagni & Little (1983) mengembangkan model untuk memprediksi efek tindakan pemasaran pada merek pilihan; dan Rust, Lemon, & Zeithaml (2004) mengembangkan pendekatan berbasis ekuitas pelanggan untuk membandingkan investasi pemasaran.…”
Section: Pemasaranunclassified