Factors Affecting the Learning Curve in the Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Prospective Study

Razpotnik, M; Bota, Simona; Kutilek, Mathilde; Essler, G; Urak, C; Prosenz, Julian; Weber-Eibel, J; Maieron, A; Peck‐Radosavljevic, Markus

doi:10.5009/gnl210560

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Clinicians in the field of cardiology, gastroenterology and ophthalmology are provided with structured training to interpret ELUS and OCT images throughout their training and fellowship programmes. 59,60 Furthermore, image co-registration has been successfully used as a training tool in cardiology to reduce the learning curve of OCT and intraluminal US. 61 Quantitative and qualitative measurements could also be clearly outlined in clinical practice guidelines as a training tool or clinical guide for clinicians interpreting images.…”

Section: Learning Curve Of Elus and Octmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The learning curve of interpreting ELUS and OCT images is one of the challenges of incorporating these imaging techniques into routine clinical practice. Clinicians in the field of cardiology, gastroenterology and ophthalmology are provided with structured training to interpret ELUS and OCT images throughout their training and fellowship programmes 59,60 . Furthermore, image co‐registration has been successfully used as a training tool in cardiology to reduce the learning curve of OCT and intraluminal US 61 …”

Section: Learning Curve Of Elus and Octmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter

Sii,

Bolton,

Tempo

et al. 2024

BJUI Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo evaluate via a review of published literature, the efficacy of endoluminal ultrasound (ELUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the following ureteric diseases: urolithiasis, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, stricture disease and pelvic‐ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO).Patients and methodsUreteric high‐frequency ELUS provides 360° imaging, to a depth of 20 mm, and has been demonstrated to assess ureteric stricture length, degree of fibrosis and aetiology. OCT produces high‐quality images with a penetration depth of 2 mm. ELUS has proven to be useful at the time of endopyelotomy for PUJO as it can identify crossing vessels, some not detectable on CT angiography, allowing the urologist to avoid these when making their incision. Ureteric ELUS may be utilised for submucosal ureteric stones as they are highly visible. Endoluminal ultrasound may be deployed in the case of known sub‐mucosal urolithiasis when the ureter appears stone‐free. It may help identify sub‐mucosal stones or stones within diverticulum.ResultsEndoluminal ultrasound has been analysed for its use in determining muscle‐invasive urothelial carcinoma of the ureter. The PPV for ≥pT2 was only 16.7% in one study of six patients with MIBC and 76.2% in 21 patients with <pT2 disease. Analysis of OCT for staging UTUC during ureteroscopy and biopsy demonstrated sensitivity for tumour invasion of 100% and specificity of 92%, 83% of lesion staging matched with histological analysis. Imaging analysis did not match histology in three patients with large exophytic tumours that exceeded the OCT depth penetration. Due to its superficial penetration, OCT cannot reliably stage large tumours.ConclusionsUreteric ELUS has been reported to be a useful tool in endopyelotomy, urolithiasis and stricture disease. The staging of ureteric urothelial carcinoma remains unsatisfactory with current imaging techniques and biopsy methods, and, based on the current literature, ELUS does not appear to have a strong enough PPV to determine muscle invasion. Ureteric OCT may be a useful tool in the future staging of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, particularly in differentiating the stage of small tumours. Further studies are needed in this area.

show abstract

Section: Learning Curve Of Elus and Octmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Learning Curve Of Elus and Octmentioning

confidence: 99%