2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68285-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting the Internal Audit Effectiveness: A Survey of the Polish Private and Public Sectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated in Table 3, there are 6 studies that use recommendation implementation rate as one of the indicators to represent the IA effectiveness. This indicator specifies the ratio between the number of audit recommendations that are approved or agreed by the auditees or management and that have been implemented, and the total number of recommendations proposed by the internal auditor (Bednarek, 2018). Although this method has certain limitations, it helps the auditee to determine -to some extent-the impact of the IA (Bednarek, 2018).…”
Section: Iaem3 Recommendation Implementation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As indicated in Table 3, there are 6 studies that use recommendation implementation rate as one of the indicators to represent the IA effectiveness. This indicator specifies the ratio between the number of audit recommendations that are approved or agreed by the auditees or management and that have been implemented, and the total number of recommendations proposed by the internal auditor (Bednarek, 2018). Although this method has certain limitations, it helps the auditee to determine -to some extent-the impact of the IA (Bednarek, 2018).…”
Section: Iaem3 Recommendation Implementation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicator specifies the ratio between the number of audit recommendations that are approved or agreed by the auditees or management and that have been implemented, and the total number of recommendations proposed by the internal auditor (Bednarek, 2018). Although this method has certain limitations, it helps the auditee to determine -to some extent-the impact of the IA (Bednarek, 2018). One of the limitations -as highlighted in study [S14]-is how the time required to implement the recommendations can be determined and when the auditee can measure the impact.…”
Section: Iaem3 Recommendation Implementation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships between internal auditors and external auditors; between internal auditors and chief audit executives and senior management; internal auditors and inter-organisational relationships are research areas that need further studies. This can be inferred from the works of Lenz et al (2017), Mustika (2015), Bednarek (2018) and Musah et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The factors of internal audit effectiveness identified were mostly attributes of internal auditors. These were auditors' characteristics including auditor competency; auditors' independence; objectivity; professional proficiency; career advancement; and auditors' experience (Baharud-din et al 2014;Endaya & Hanefah, 2016;Dellai & Omri, 2016;Tackie et al, 2016;Mustika, 2015;Shamki & Alhajri, 2017;Bednarek, 2017;Rudhani et al, 2017;Hailemariam, 2014;Chevers et al, 2016;Bednarek, 2018;Musah et al, 2018). Attention of researchers could be deepened in the attributes of internal auditors as catalyst of internal audit effectiveness and understanding the dynamism of audit problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation