Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1967
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1967)095<0878:fateca>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FACTORS AFFECTING THE ELECTRIC CHARGE ACQUIRED BY AN ICE SPHERE MOVING THROUGH NATURAL SNOWFALL1

Abstract: The factors affecting the electric charge acquired by an ice sphere moving through natural snowfall have been investigated experimentally. When graupel particles were in the air the sphere always received a positive charge. If graupel was not present the sign of the charge appeared to be related to the direction of the atmospheric electric field.When the field was directed downwards the ice sphere received negative charge, and when the field was directed upwards the sphere received positive charge.The results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Superposed on the three previous mechanisms are the charge separation effects due to splintering, or secondary crystal production, and to inductive polarization by an external field. Depending on strength and sign of the latter, separation of inductively polarized charge by colliding particles may enhance or reduce charge separation by other processes [e.g., Buser, 1976]; it may become dominant [Shewchuk and Iribarne, 1974] and then determine the sign of overall charge separation [Hobbs and Burrows, 1966;Burrows et al, 1967;Scott and Hobbs, 1968;Pruppacher and Klett, 1978, pp. 601-605].…”
Section: Collision Mechanisms In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superposed on the three previous mechanisms are the charge separation effects due to splintering, or secondary crystal production, and to inductive polarization by an external field. Depending on strength and sign of the latter, separation of inductively polarized charge by colliding particles may enhance or reduce charge separation by other processes [e.g., Buser, 1976]; it may become dominant [Shewchuk and Iribarne, 1974] and then determine the sign of overall charge separation [Hobbs and Burrows, 1966;Burrows et al, 1967;Scott and Hobbs, 1968;Pruppacher and Klett, 1978, pp. 601-605].…”
Section: Collision Mechanisms In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%