2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1888-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting the delivery of community pharmacist-led medication reviews: evidence from the MedsCheck annual service in Ontario

Abstract: BackgroundMedication reviews have become part of pharmacy practice across developed countries. This study aimed to identify factors affecting the likelihood of eligible Ontario seniors receiving a pharmacy-led medication review called MedsCheck annual (MCA).MethodsWe designed a cohort study using a random sample of pharmacy claims for MCA-eligible Ontario seniors using linked administrative data from April 2012 to March 2013. Guided by a conceptual framework, we constructed a generalized-estimating-equations m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 in Canada, government-funded, community pharmacy-led adherence support services began in Ontario in 2007. 16 Other provinces have since developed adherence support services and several also run funded medication review services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 in Canada, government-funded, community pharmacy-led adherence support services began in Ontario in 2007. 16 Other provinces have since developed adherence support services and several also run funded medication review services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low rates of MedsCheck (9%) for eligible patients in our study suggests that there may be challenges with current programme implementation 43. In addition, low rates of MedsCheck suggest that recipients may be highly selected 28. We could not distinguish which patients declined to receive a MedsCheck and which were simply not offered the service despite being eligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…MedsCheck programme documentation did not define ‘chronic medications’, however we adopted a previously used definition (online supplementary eTable 1). 19 28 The 7-day window for the prescription fill was selected to capture medication changes resulting from hospitalisation 29…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And without evidence as to what constitutes an effective, quality service, pharmacists have no guidance as to how to improve their performance. For example, reporting that pharmacists are providing too few medication reviews and are not focusing on quality reviews to the right patients is inappropriate when there is no understanding of what constitutes a quality medication review, which patients can benefit most from this service and what outcomes, if any, are achieved by provision of the service (77,78).…”
Section: Research Question 3: Figure 1 Point B Audit and Feedback Fomentioning
confidence: 99%