2009
DOI: 10.1175/2009waf2222248.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Surface Wind Speeds in Gravity Waves and Wake Lows

Abstract: Ducted gravity waves and wake lows have been associated with numerous documented cases of ''severe'' winds (.25 m s 21 ) and wind damage. These winds are associated with the pressure perturbations and transient mesoscale pressure gradients occurring in many gravity waves and wake lows. However, not all wake lows and gravity waves produce significant winds nor wind damage. In this paper, the factors that affect the surface winds produced by ducted gravity waves and wake lows are reviewed and examined. It is sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…including the parts of the lulls extending beyond the boundaries of the WDA, was from 1250 to 1330, corresponding roughly to the duration of the positive surface-pressure anomaly. The wind-speed component in the direction of the southwesterly system velocity is well correlated with the surface pressure anomaly (a correlation coefficient of 0.78 for 1245 to 1345) as expected from Coleman and Knupp (2009). These anomalies will be shown to be closely associated with, and probably largely due to, the wave in the cool undercurrent.…”
Section: Surface Observations During the Passage Of The Mcssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…including the parts of the lulls extending beyond the boundaries of the WDA, was from 1250 to 1330, corresponding roughly to the duration of the positive surface-pressure anomaly. The wind-speed component in the direction of the southwesterly system velocity is well correlated with the surface pressure anomaly (a correlation coefficient of 0.78 for 1245 to 1345) as expected from Coleman and Knupp (2009). These anomalies will be shown to be closely associated with, and probably largely due to, the wave in the cool undercurrent.…”
Section: Surface Observations During the Passage Of The Mcssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Of interest is the fact that the pressure couplet defined by the wake low and mesohigh largely exhibits positive p′-u′ correlation as is characteristic of MGWs, as noted earlier (Koch and Siedlarz 1999;Coleman and Knupp 2009). The interpretation of the wake low-mesohigh couplet as a gravity wave is further supported by the idealized linear modeling study of Haertel and Johnson (2000), which demonstrated that an imposed stratiform-like forcing characterized by latent cooling alone can excite a gravity wave response consistent with a mesohigh-wake low couplet.…”
Section: Wave Amplification: the Role Of Moist Convectionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Another pattern that emerges from a review of many large-amplitude MGW events is the strong parallel between MGWsespecially singular waves of depressionand squall line wake low-mesohigh couplets (Bosart and Seimon 1988;Koch et al 1988;Koch and Siedlarz 1999;Coleman andKnupp 2009, 2011;Ruppert and Bosart 2014). This conceptual framework is schematically depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Wave Amplification: the Role Of Moist Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between wind perturbations and pressure perturbations in disturbances such as gravity waves (e.g., Coleman and Knupp 2009;Trexler and Koch 2000;Bosart and Sanders 1986) is consistent with this relationship. The classical impedance relation may be derived by linearizing the horizontal momentum equation at the surface (where w 5 0), and then integrating this equation over time in a propagating, form-preserving disturbance in pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%