2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting primary fascial closure of the open abdomen in the nontrauma patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 In our series, we observed an equally high rate of closure in patients with nontraumatic etiologies, possibly because we used the ABThera system, which allowed for suctioning of the pelvis, paracolic gutters and subdiaphragmatic spaces. The previous studies used a VAC system, which may not have been able to decontaminate the abdomen as readily and thereby prevented successful primary closure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,18 In our series, we observed an equally high rate of closure in patients with nontraumatic etiologies, possibly because we used the ABThera system, which allowed for suctioning of the pelvis, paracolic gutters and subdiaphragmatic spaces. The previous studies used a VAC system, which may not have been able to decontaminate the abdomen as readily and thereby prevented successful primary closure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In our experience as well as other authors', it is usually apparent 4-7 days after placement of the ABThera that the fascia retracts further and will likely not close with the ABThera alone. 10,17 Although the reason for using an ABRA in addition to the ABThera was not recorded in our series, surgeons typically choose to use the ABRA in patients in whom they feel the fascia is unlikely to close with the ABThera alone. Consequently, we hypothesize that if the ABThera had been used without the ABRA, a primary fascial closure rate of less than 70% would have been observed in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The best approach to achieve the definitive abdominal closure in patients with open abdomen remains controversial. To improve the fascial closure rate, the excess volume resuscitation should be avoided, the water balance should be carefully implemented, not only on admission, but also throughout the course of treatment with open abdomen 20 . The high rate of primary closure found in our patients, 80% for BB and 96% for the VAC, no statistical difference was due to the above mentioned guidelines and monitoring carried out by the same team of surgeons in all reoperations.…”
Section: Discussion Discussion Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the therapeutic objective has been achieved, closure of the musculofascial layers should be performed [3,4,[8][9][10] . However, closure of the open abdomen depends on the method used for temporary abdominal wall closure [3,8,9] , the capacity of tissues for healing without tension, and whether or not enteroatmospheric fistulas are present.…”
Section: Intentional (Planned) Acute Poawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity of tissues for healing without tension depends on wound-related factors and the patient's general condition [11] . Independently of the technique used for temporary abdominal wall closure, there is a limited window of 2-3 wk to assess early vs delayed closure [8][9][10][11]13,14] . Early definitive closure (final closure of the abdominal defect within the window of 2-3 wk) is based on the resolution of interstitial edema and the evidence of non-adherence between the bowel loops and the abdominal wall.…”
Section: Intentional (Planned) Acute Poawmentioning
confidence: 99%