The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple phenomenological models of the ANF responses to electrical stimulation have been proposed (Bruce et al 1999a, 1999b; Miller et al 1999; Rubinstein et al 2001; Litvak et al 2003; Nourski et al 2006; Macherey et al 2007; Fredelake and Hohmann 2012; Goldwyn et al 2012; Morse et al 2015; Horne et al 2016). These models do not consider multiple sites of spike generation and their effect on spike time statistics, and hence cannot be generalized to assess different CI stimulation strategies (Joshi et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple phenomenological models of the ANF responses to electrical stimulation have been proposed (Bruce et al 1999a, 1999b; Miller et al 1999; Rubinstein et al 2001; Litvak et al 2003; Nourski et al 2006; Macherey et al 2007; Fredelake and Hohmann 2012; Goldwyn et al 2012; Morse et al 2015; Horne et al 2016). These models do not consider multiple sites of spike generation and their effect on spike time statistics, and hence cannot be generalized to assess different CI stimulation strategies (Joshi et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it has been assumed that only the cathodic phase of a biphasic pulse will generate a spike. Based on this assumption, state-of-the-art quantitative models of ANF responses have mainly focused on the responsiveness of the ANF to the depolarizing cathodic phase (Bruce et al 1999a; Hamacher 2004; Fredelake and Hohmann 2012; Goldwyn et al 2012) or on inhibitory properties of the hyperpolarizing anodic phase (Rubinstein et al 2001; Horne et al 2016). Any charge-balanced pulse can be decomposed into anodic and cathodic charges, and responses to various pulse shapes are a consequence of the sensitivity to the single pulse phases and the interaction between these.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires more advanced neural models that include modelling of central processing. An example of the latter appears in Fredelake et al (2012), who developed a model to predict speech perception.…”
Section: Model-predicted Mapping (Mpm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is paramount for CIs to achieve optimal speech perception, recent approaches have used simple electric field models together with phenomenological or biophysical auditory nerve models as front ends to predict speech intelligibility with CIs. Fredelake and Hohmann (2012) have used the model by Hamacher (2004), integrated the output across multiple fibers and time, and used this as input to a statistical classifier to predict speech intelligibility.…”
Section: Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%