Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface 1999
DOI: 10.1201/9781420073560.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Mechanical Properties of Bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the female group of the present study, there were no individuals younger than 52 years. The authors, therefore, conclude in concordance with Zioupos et al (2000) that postmenopausal female bone tends to undergo accelerated resorption, which increases porosity levels and consequently produces a weaker bone matrix material (internal porosity) with rarefaction of the bone structure, i.e. a breakdown of the bone matrix.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In the female group of the present study, there were no individuals younger than 52 years. The authors, therefore, conclude in concordance with Zioupos et al (2000) that postmenopausal female bone tends to undergo accelerated resorption, which increases porosity levels and consequently produces a weaker bone matrix material (internal porosity) with rarefaction of the bone structure, i.e. a breakdown of the bone matrix.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This lack of correspondence between our measurements of E (see Table 1) and those of other workers is little surprising given the uncertain preservation history of our material. Several studies have suggested that formalin fixation changes, to some extent, the material properties of bone (Reilly & Burstein, 1974; Zioupos et al. 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of correspondence between our measurements of E (see Table 1) and those of other workers is little surprising given the uncertain preservation history of our material. Several studies have suggested that formalin fixation changes, to some extent, the material properties of bone (Reilly & Burstein, 1974;Zioupos et al 2000). In particular, it was shown that fixation results in a decrease in bone stiffness of pigs after 2 weeks of preservation (Dechow & Huynh, 1994), although Currey et al (1995) showed that fixing bone from an 18-month-old bovine in a 10% formalin mixture for 3 h and subsequent buffering for 3 days has only a limited effect on the elastic modulus in tension.…”
Section: Variation Of Bone Elastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lengthy period required for the collection of opportunistic specimens, cadavers were stored in a freezer for several years before specimens were processed. Although there are concerns over the effects of formalin fixation and freezing on the mechanical properties of bones (i.e., Evans, 1973; Sara and Williams, 1988; Zioupos et al, 2000; Nazarian et al, 2009), studies have reported that long term freezing does not have a measureable impact on cortical bone elastic properties measured ultrasonically (Evans, 1973; Zioupos et al, 2000). Further, if bone samples, including those fixed in formalin for no more than two weeks, are re-hydrated before testing, the bone elastic mechanical properties have little alteration (Nazarian et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, if bone samples, including those fixed in formalin for no more than two weeks, are re-hydrated before testing, the bone elastic mechanical properties have little alteration (Nazarian et al, 2009). In our study, cortical bone samples after preparation were kept hydrated in equal proportions of 95% ethanol and isotonic saline, which maintains the elastic properties of bone over time (Ashman et al, 1984; Zioupus et al, 2000). We were not able to obtain juvenile female specimens during this research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%