2001
DOI: 10.1207/s15327744joce1102_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Information Technology Usage: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
71
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathieson et al (2001) find that Bperceived user resources^including access to computing resources, personal knowledge, time, and availability of support are significant predictors of system usage. These findings are consistent with Mahmood and Swanberg's (2001) concept of Borganizational support^which emphasizes both enablement and encouragement by management, and with Anakwe et al's (2000) analysis of organizational support and IT usage. Training efforts are a particularly important element of user enablement.…”
Section: User Enablement and Management Support Positively Influence supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mathieson et al (2001) find that Bperceived user resources^including access to computing resources, personal knowledge, time, and availability of support are significant predictors of system usage. These findings are consistent with Mahmood and Swanberg's (2001) concept of Borganizational support^which emphasizes both enablement and encouragement by management, and with Anakwe et al's (2000) analysis of organizational support and IT usage. Training efforts are a particularly important element of user enablement.…”
Section: User Enablement and Management Support Positively Influence supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Educational level, like other individual factors, has been studied as an antecedent of PU or PEOU (Agarwal & Prasad, 1999) and as a moderator that affects the relationship between main determinates and behavioural intention (Burton- Jones & Hubona, 2006). In particular, educational level was found to influence the relationships between PEOU, PU, SN and BI (Porter & Donthu, 2006;Rogers, 2003;Sun & Zhang, 2006;Zakaria, 2001;Mahmood, Hall, & Swanberg, 2001;Burton-Jones & Hubona, 2006). found a positive correlation between the level of education and PU, Similarly, Burton- Jones and Hubona (2006) suggested that higher education level leads to positive association with PU and those users are less sensitive to PEOU since it will reduce the computer anxiety and improve the overall attitude.…”
Section: Educational Levelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Numerous studies have confirmed that individual staff characteristics have a crucial role to play in the implementation of new technologies in an organisation (Venkatesh & Morris, 2000;Mahmood, Hall & Swanberg, 2001;Davenport, 2013).…”
Section: Human Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%