2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dotted lines demonstrate the fit values for 25% and 75% glandular breasts ͑bottom to top͒. The measured mammography dose levels are very consistent with those reported by other authors, 9 and even in the era of mammography "dose creep," 10 the mean glandular dose for a single view mammogram of a 4.5 cm 50%/50% breast was 2.16 mGy. Figure 5 illustrates the relationship between the breast diameter and the compressed breast thickness, based upon measured data from 200 women undergoing routine annual screening mammography.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The dotted lines demonstrate the fit values for 25% and 75% glandular breasts ͑bottom to top͒. The measured mammography dose levels are very consistent with those reported by other authors, 9 and even in the era of mammography "dose creep," 10 the mean glandular dose for a single view mammogram of a 4.5 cm 50%/50% breast was 2.16 mGy. Figure 5 illustrates the relationship between the breast diameter and the compressed breast thickness, based upon measured data from 200 women undergoing routine annual screening mammography.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%