2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting group creativity: lessons from musical ensembles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is evidence that personal attributes interact with situational variables to affect group creativity. Any comprehensive analysis of creativity should be predicated on the total interaction between people, tasks, and situations (Amabile, 1996;Slayton et al, 2019;Tromp & Sternberg, 2022;Zhou et al, 2020). This experiment indicated a negative correlation between group dynamics and creativity, rejecting hypothesis 1.…”
Section: Discussion Part 1: Relationship Between Group Dynamics and C...mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is evidence that personal attributes interact with situational variables to affect group creativity. Any comprehensive analysis of creativity should be predicated on the total interaction between people, tasks, and situations (Amabile, 1996;Slayton et al, 2019;Tromp & Sternberg, 2022;Zhou et al, 2020). This experiment indicated a negative correlation between group dynamics and creativity, rejecting hypothesis 1.…”
Section: Discussion Part 1: Relationship Between Group Dynamics and C...mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…While groups can promote creativity through the combined experiences, expertise, and resources of multiple individuals pursuing a common goal, certain conditions can lead to narrow thinking, leading to a reduced quality of creativity. Personal attributes interact with situational variables to influence creativity in groups (Slayton et al, 2019). As Kurtzberg andAmabile (2000-2001) argued, natural team interactions seem to hinder creativity: creativity is not a spontaneous process but is the intersection of an individual's creativity-relevant skills, domain-relevant skills, and motivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In psychological studies, creativity is often defined as the capacity of an individual to create original and useful ideas, insights and solutions (see e.g., Amabile, 1996;Ekvall, 1996;West, 1990;Woodman et al, 1993;Sternberg & Lubart, 1999). However, in recent years, as a response to the literature concerning creativity as a quality and mental property of an individual, or as a novel outcome of an individual's action, we can find an increasing number of studies suggesting that this individualistic notion needs to be complemented with a broader approach, examining creativity as a multidimensional, collective and collaborative phenomenon (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996;John-Steiner, 2000;Sawyer & deZutter, 2009;Glaveanu, 2011;Sawyer, 2012;Littleton et al, 2012;Sannino & Ellis, 2013;Runco & Beghetto, 2019;Slayton et al, 2019;Glaveanu et al, 2020). From this perspective, the social context, culture and communities of actors with different understandings (e.g., novices and experts) are considered central in contributing to the creative processes (Drazin et al, 1999;Glaveanu, 2011;Sawyer, 2004) and practices, such as problemsolving (Segers et al, 2018) leading to novel outcomes (Hakkarainen et al, 2013;Oddane, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) showed increased prefrontal activation in trained musicians relative to demographically matched nonmusicians during a divergent thinking task (Gibson et al, 2009), but the musician group had a significantly higher full-scale IQ than the comparison group. A related study tied resting-state fMRI connectivity changes in the default mode, salience network, executive control, and motor planning to musicality (Bashwiner et al, 2020); but brain regions associated with musical creativity may differ depending on whether convergent or divergent thinking is being recruited (Slayton et al, 2019). Another study showed higher coupling of EC with DMN networks, along with lower connectivity within EC but higher connectivity within DMN, in a group of professional visual artists compared to an education-matched comparison group (De Pisapia et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%