“…In psychological studies, creativity is often defined as the capacity of an individual to create original and useful ideas, insights and solutions (see e.g., Amabile, 1996;Ekvall, 1996;West, 1990;Woodman et al, 1993;Sternberg & Lubart, 1999). However, in recent years, as a response to the literature concerning creativity as a quality and mental property of an individual, or as a novel outcome of an individual's action, we can find an increasing number of studies suggesting that this individualistic notion needs to be complemented with a broader approach, examining creativity as a multidimensional, collective and collaborative phenomenon (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996;John-Steiner, 2000;Sawyer & deZutter, 2009;Glaveanu, 2011;Sawyer, 2012;Littleton et al, 2012;Sannino & Ellis, 2013;Runco & Beghetto, 2019;Slayton et al, 2019;Glaveanu et al, 2020). From this perspective, the social context, culture and communities of actors with different understandings (e.g., novices and experts) are considered central in contributing to the creative processes (Drazin et al, 1999;Glaveanu, 2011;Sawyer, 2004) and practices, such as problemsolving (Segers et al, 2018) leading to novel outcomes (Hakkarainen et al, 2013;Oddane, 2014).…”