1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001670050218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting graft excursion patterns in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract: The effect of femoral guide rotation in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is reviewed based on a previous report. The effect of varied offsets of the femoral guide (5.5 and 7.0 mm) are described. This is one of the few isometry studies to evaluate the knee through a practically full range of motion (0 degree-120 degrees). A 7-mm offset guide rotated to the 12:00 position yields the best single fiber and graft excursion patterns (P < 0.05). A 5.5-mm offset guide yields inferior single f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[43][44][45][46][47][48][49] They noted similar findings to our study with graft lengths and forces decreasing with knee flexion from 0-degree extension and eventually increasing again with deeper knee flexion angles. 11,21, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49] All of these studies evaluated transtibial tunnel drilling except Sim et al who evaluated AM portal, outside-in, and transtibial femoral drilling techniques with hamstring grafts. They found that graft forces were no different from native ACL forces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[43][44][45][46][47][48][49] They noted similar findings to our study with graft lengths and forces decreasing with knee flexion from 0-degree extension and eventually increasing again with deeper knee flexion angles. 11,21, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49] All of these studies evaluated transtibial tunnel drilling except Sim et al who evaluated AM portal, outside-in, and transtibial femoral drilling techniques with hamstring grafts. They found that graft forces were no different from native ACL forces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…An actual graft composed of multiple fibers and bundles may have behaved differently from the smaller diameter FiberWire, and it is known that different locations within a transtibial graft see different forces and length changes. 43,44,48 It would not have been possible to use actual tunnels and grafts for each of the three techniques on each specimen, though we feel that our method is a reasonable compromise. When measuring tension, the initial tension was set in full extension as opposed to 30degree flexion or some other angle as may be done during surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los estudios basados en la isometría han demostrado la posición del túnel femoral alto, en la escotadura intercondílea, en una posición poco anatómica [60] poder alcanzar la pared posterior para situar al túnel femoral (BROPHY) y evitar el pinzamiento de la plastia [116]. Estas recomendaciones sitúan el túnel tibial en la inserción del fascículo PL en la huella del LCA [257].…”
Section: Las Muestras Correspondieron a Los Siguientes Grupos (Tabla 5)unclassified
“…Las dos muestras de dos años revelaron una buena orientación de las fibras y encontraron células fusiformes. Por su parte, Cooper et al [60] vieron que los fibroblastos tendinosos proliferaron más rápidos que los fibroblastos del LCA, señalando Petersen et all [194] que la densidad de fibroblastos incide negativamente en las propiedades mecánicas del tendón.…”
Section: Fijación Del Injertounclassified
“… 3 In this isometric reconstruction technique, the femoral socket was key in ensuring graft isometry. Previous studies revealed the anterior–superior border of the anatomical ACL footprint as the isometric point 4 , 5 , 6 ; however, after overdrilling a guide pin that was inserted at the point, the tunnel aperture occupied mostly the outside of the footprint. Thus, these grafts, which were least anatomical and nonphysiological, resulted in several problems such as impingement against the intercondylar notch/wall or the posterior cruciate ligament, 7 , 8 , 9 and poor control in rotational stability because of vertical graft orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%