2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2006.00226.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting fish assemblage structure during seasonal stream drying

Abstract: We evaluated fish assemblage structure during stream drying in north west Arkansas in 2002 and 2003. We sampled fish with a seine and backpack electrofisher and measured habitat variables along transects. Linear regression models were selected a priori and ranked according to Akaike's Information Criterion. In 2002, total fish density was negatively related to pool area and maximum depth, and positively related to canopy openness and substrate diversity. Similarly, central stoneroller (Campostoma anomalum, Raf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(30 reference statements)
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to day vertical beaming data, downstream fish density in Siliana Reservoir was lower than the middle and upstream strata, while biomass was higher, consistent with big fish occupying deep water and small fish occupying shallower upstream areas. These results are in accordance with the study of Dekar and Magoulick (2007), where fish density was negatively related to maximum depth, and with the study of Power (1987), who asserts that increasing maximum depth can result in greater predation risk from larger aquatic predators. In Masri, Joumine and Sidi-el-Barak reservoirs, statistical analyses indicated no biomass gradient existed across strata; nevertheless, assessment could be improved with specific species size-weight relationships of fish from Tunisian reservoirs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…According to day vertical beaming data, downstream fish density in Siliana Reservoir was lower than the middle and upstream strata, while biomass was higher, consistent with big fish occupying deep water and small fish occupying shallower upstream areas. These results are in accordance with the study of Dekar and Magoulick (2007), where fish density was negatively related to maximum depth, and with the study of Power (1987), who asserts that increasing maximum depth can result in greater predation risk from larger aquatic predators. In Masri, Joumine and Sidi-el-Barak reservoirs, statistical analyses indicated no biomass gradient existed across strata; nevertheless, assessment could be improved with specific species size-weight relationships of fish from Tunisian reservoirs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The important role played by periodically inundated or temporary habitats as fish nursery and feeding areas has been demonstrated (Cucherousset et al 2007), as has the role of isolated waterbodies as refugia from disturbance associated with drying (Magoulick & Kobza 2003;Dekar & Magoulick 2007). However, despite the recognized ecological value of temporary habitats, prior studies have not considered entirely ephemeral catchments, nor the behaviour of their resident biota through time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Small streams in Gr2 are under threat of drying out. Fish can survive in such streams providing there exist some refugia with sufficiently deep water (Dekar and Magoulick 2007). Dams tightened by beavers lead to water retention during a drought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%