Equine Applied and Clinical Nutrition 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7020-3422-0.00003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting feed intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As rate of intake depends in part on the density and ease of comminution of the feed (Bonin et al . ; Cuddeford ) horses take longer to chew roughage and therefore the DM of the swallowed bolus is much lower (~11–15% DM) than when, for example, a pelleted complementary feed is fed (~35% DM). The chewing cycle is complex (Bonin et al .…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Gastrointestinal Physiology As It Influementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As rate of intake depends in part on the density and ease of comminution of the feed (Bonin et al . ; Cuddeford ) horses take longer to chew roughage and therefore the DM of the swallowed bolus is much lower (~11–15% DM) than when, for example, a pelleted complementary feed is fed (~35% DM). The chewing cycle is complex (Bonin et al .…”
Section: Basic Principles Of Gastrointestinal Physiology As It Influementioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Grass intake by horses, however, is generally reported as being lower (although this can vary according to the individual) at ~2–2.5% bwt/day on a DM basis (Cuddeford ; Chavez et al . ).…”
Section: Foragementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations