2022
DOI: 10.1177/20552076221125976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting doctor’s recommendation for mobile health services

Abstract: Objective: As a new medical service mode, the value of mobile health (mHealth) services has received increasing attention and recognition. However, compared with the owners of mobile devices, the user scale of mHealth services is still small. It is well known that doctors' recommendations have an important impact on what kind of medical service patients choose. To explore the key factors affecting doctors' recommendation of mHealth services to patients, and to provide countermeasures for mHealth service provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Younger physicians at a lower professional rank, who tend to be more open to new technologies, are more likely to recommend mHealth solutions [72] . In countries where mHealth solutions are still in their infancy, it may be more effective to focus on the benefits of mHealth solutions for physicians themselves rather than the benefits for patients to increase adoption [106] . Future research and development of mHealth applications for CLBP should consider a scientific evidence base and engage in a multidisciplinary approach between application developers, healthcare professionals, and patients [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger physicians at a lower professional rank, who tend to be more open to new technologies, are more likely to recommend mHealth solutions [72] . In countries where mHealth solutions are still in their infancy, it may be more effective to focus on the benefits of mHealth solutions for physicians themselves rather than the benefits for patients to increase adoption [106] . Future research and development of mHealth applications for CLBP should consider a scientific evidence base and engage in a multidisciplinary approach between application developers, healthcare professionals, and patients [16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Swinkels et al, 23 ; 2 Muhos et al, 24 ; 3 Fillo et al, 25 ; 4 Lim and Anderson, 26 ; 5 Oderanti et al, 27 ; 6 Dalton, 28 ; 7 Neinstein et al, 29 ; 8 Vannieuwenborg, Verbrugge and Colle, 30 ; 9 Oderanti and Li, 31 ; 10 van Limburg et al, 32 ; 11 Bhattacharyya et al, 33 ; 12 Vermeulen et al, 34 ; 13 Vimarlund, Nikula and Nøhr, 35 ; 14 Hu, Fang and Wang, 36 ; 15 Lan et al, 37 ; 16 Li et al, 38 ; 17 Ross et al, 39 ; 18 Simon et al, 40 ; 19 Carlqvist et al, 41 ; 20 Kujala et al, 42 ; 21 Sezgin, Özkan-Yildirim and Yildirim, 43 ; 22 Alami et al, 44 ; 23 Semple et al, 45 ; 24 Bauer et al, 46 ; 25 Polhemus et al, 47 ; 26 Peek et al 48 …”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Data were collected from completed questionnaires, and the number of samples collected from questionnaires were more than five times the number of questionnaire questions as recommended by the statistician to ensure confidence in the results [14][15][16]. The questionnaire for this study had a total of 42 questions, so a minimum of 210 samples were needed.…”
Section: Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%