2016
DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2015.1125082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting confidence and knowledge in spinal palpation among International Manual Physical Therapists

Abstract: Objectives: We sought to find if there was a relationship between the confidence in use of static palpation, passive physiological intervertebral motion (PPIVM) and passive accessory intervertebral motion (PAIVM) and the manual therapist's (MTs) knowledge of the literature on these topics. Methods: We designed an international survey to achieve our objectives. Each skill was surveyed for the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spines. We also included several other factors that we believed might influence the use of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several studies have found the intra-rater reliability of thoracic spine mobility assessed manually to be at least moderate in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects [ 19 , 42 – 44 ]. However, the skill of finding the desired spinal segment and identifying it similarly between observers seems to be difficult and unreliable [ 45 ]; there seems to be a great difference between observers [ 40 ], and none of the palpation methods seem to be superior to evaluating thoracic spine mobility manually [ 24 ]. Heiderscheitet et al [ 46 ] reposted in the asymptomatic subjects the intra-rater reliability of PA pressure of the thoracic spine has strong reliability (kappa = 0.61–0.75), whereas in interrater reliability kappa value was lower (0.59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, several studies have found the intra-rater reliability of thoracic spine mobility assessed manually to be at least moderate in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects [ 19 , 42 – 44 ]. However, the skill of finding the desired spinal segment and identifying it similarly between observers seems to be difficult and unreliable [ 45 ]; there seems to be a great difference between observers [ 40 ], and none of the palpation methods seem to be superior to evaluating thoracic spine mobility manually [ 24 ]. Heiderscheitet et al [ 46 ] reposted in the asymptomatic subjects the intra-rater reliability of PA pressure of the thoracic spine has strong reliability (kappa = 0.61–0.75), whereas in interrater reliability kappa value was lower (0.59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical framework, examining spinal range of motion has been an important part of manual therapy practice [23,24]. It has been reported that 98% of manual therapists evaluates passive movement of spinal segments as part of their clinical assessment [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, thrust manipulation (TM) has not been studied in the SF population. In non-surgical populations, there is disagreement regarding the benefit of regional versus specific TM [15,16]. Therefore, the purpose of this case report was to describe how specific TM was used to treat a patient with scoliosis after multilevel SF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%