1994
DOI: 10.1897/1552-8618(1994)13[1727:facabr]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Chemical and Biological Reduction of Hexavalent Chromium in Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) in soils has often been found to be rapid and reaching the maximum within a relatively short time (Ross et al, 1981). The supply of carbons and protons, and stimulation of microorganisms that are considered to be the major factors enhancing the reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) (Losi et al, 1994;Bolan et al, 2003). The result corroborates with the findings of Bolan et al 2003.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) in soils has often been found to be rapid and reaching the maximum within a relatively short time (Ross et al, 1981). The supply of carbons and protons, and stimulation of microorganisms that are considered to be the major factors enhancing the reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) (Losi et al, 1994;Bolan et al, 2003). The result corroborates with the findings of Bolan et al 2003.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There is a conflicting effect on using mineralization of organic C in metal contaminated soils because of the stimulation and inhibition on respiration [59,60]. Results of under the canopy soils show that Cr(VI)could have effects on complex soil organic matter and render it less available by reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) [61,62]. Thus, under the canopy soil which had more organic C, there was less inhibition of CO 2 production rate than outside canopy soils.…”
Section: N and C Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite trend occurred with nonresidual fraction (sum of fraction I, II, III, IV, and V) which tended to decrease with time in the two soils ( The greater percentage of Cr in the residual fraction at 120 days of incubation ( Table 3) (40-65%) probably reflects the greater tendency of Cr to become unavailable once it is in the soil [63]. The residual and non-residual Cr suggest that the metal bioavailability does not only depend on its concentration but is also affected by the characteristics of the tannery sludge and soil components (such as Fe, Mn, oxides, or the quality of organic matter) into which it is sorbed [61].This will have an impact in the interaction between Cr and the biota [64].…”
Section: Cr Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detoxification of chromium in soil is based on the fact that Cr(VI) is readily reduced to Cr(III) and immobilized in organic matter rich soils. The use of Cr(VI)contaminated groundwater to irrigate organic matter rich soil based on the mechanism of reduction and precipitation of Cr in the soil as Cr(III) [20,21]. In a study to examine the processes responsible for Cr(VI) reduction in soil, it was reported that organic matter content, bioactivity, and oxygen status were among the important factors [21].…”
Section: Chromium In the Environment: Factors Affecting Biological Rementioning
confidence: 99%