2017
DOI: 10.1080/19427867.2017.1329891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting carsharing program participants’ car ownership changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other context-specific factors are the availability of public transport and parking spaces, the types of shared cars, and the cultural context. Two studies analyze station-based car-sharing in Seoul, South Korea, and find that good public transport and parking space problems are critical to motivating people to abandon cars [22,23]. The authors estimate that one station-based car replaces three to five private cars, for the latter assuming a member-to-car ratio of 40:1, which is the median ratio of all reviewed studies that report members and vehicles.…”
Section: Station-based Car-sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other context-specific factors are the availability of public transport and parking spaces, the types of shared cars, and the cultural context. Two studies analyze station-based car-sharing in Seoul, South Korea, and find that good public transport and parking space problems are critical to motivating people to abandon cars [22,23]. The authors estimate that one station-based car replaces three to five private cars, for the latter assuming a member-to-car ratio of 40:1, which is the median ratio of all reviewed studies that report members and vehicles.…”
Section: Station-based Car-sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the share of active subscribers is unknown, and survey participants are disproportionately active. Therefore, we consider a ratio of 40:1 as a conservative but reasonable benchmark [22,23]. Another study from China suggests that the potential savings in the number of cars can be even greater in developing countries, as most households do not yet own a car [24].…”
Section: Station-based Car-sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one is related to their impacts on travel behavior (e.g., impacts on activity patterns or mode choice decisions). The current literature has mainly covered bikesharing [19][20][21][22][23][24], carsharing [15,[25][26][27][28], on-demand ride services [29], and recently kick scooter sharing [30,31]. The scarcity of scientific literature on moped sharing is a point underlined by Howe and Bock [32].…”
Section: Literature Review: Shared Mobility and Travel Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, car-sharing has been promoted by the City of Bremen, Germany, to reduce vehicular travel (Glotz-Richter 2016). The strong links between car-sharing membership and use and auto ownership levels and use suggest that car-sharing service membership acts as an alternative from among the full range of mobility tools considered by households (Wittwer and Hubrich 2018;Ko, Ki, and Lee 2019;Rotaris, Danielis, and Maltese 2019). As such, car-sharing has been implemented in recent mobility models, including Cangialosi, Di Febbraro, and Sacco (2015), Zhou and Kockelman (2011), Costain, Ardron, and Habib (2012), and de Lorimier and El-Geneidy (2013).…”
Section: Car-sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%