Factors affecting breeding dispersal of European ducks on Engure Marsh, Latvia

Abstract

Summary 1.We used up to 35 years of capture-recapture data from nearly 3300 individual female ducks nesting on Engure Marsh, Latvia, and multistate modelling to test predictions about the influence of environmental, habitat and management factors on breeding dispersal probability within the marsh. 2. Analyses based on observed dispersal distances of common pochards and tufted ducks provided no evidence that breeding success in year t influenced dispersal distance between t and t + 1. 3. Breeding dispersal distances (year t to t + 1) of pochards and tufted ducks were associated with a delay in relative nest initiation dates in year t + 1. The delay was greater for pochards ( c . 4 days) than for tufted ducks ( c . 2 days) when females dispersed > 0·8 km. 4. Northern shovelers and tufted ducks moved from a large island to small islands at low water levels and from small islands to the large island at high water levels before the construction of elevated small islands . Following this habitat management (1983-94), breeding fidelity was extremely high and not influenced by water level in the marsh for either species. 5. Because pochard nesting habitats in black-headed gull colonies were saturated during the entire study period, nesting females moved into and out of colonies with similar probabilities. Local survival probabilities and incubation body masses were higher for both yearlings ( SY ) and adults ( ASY ) nesting within gull colonies, suggesting that these females were of better quality than females nesting outside of the colonies. 6. Tufted ducks showed higher probabilities of moving from islands to emergent marshes when water levels were higher both before and after habitat management. However, rates of movement for a given water level were higher during the period before management than after. 7. Both pochards and tufted ducks exhibited asymmetric movement with respect to proximity to water, with higher movement probabilities to near-water nesting locations than away from these locations. 8. Multistate capture-recapture models provided analyses that were useful in investigating sources of variation in breeding dispersal probabilities.

Spatiotemporal variation in reproductive parameters of yellow-bellied marmots

“…The influence of a covariate on a parameter was evaluated by comparing the difference in AIC c (DAIC c ) between models with and without the covariate; DAIC c >2 was taken as an evidence of support for the relationship between the parameter and the covariate. The 95% confidence interval for the slope parameter (b) indicated the direction and magnitude of the relationship (e.g., Blums et al 2003;Ozgul et al 2006). Proportion of variation explained by each covariate was assessed by comparing the deviances of constant, covariate and general models (e.g., Barbraud et al 2000;Gaillard et al 1997).…”

Breeding success and brood parasitism affect return rate and dispersal distances in the great reed warbler

“…This is mainly because the study of this phenomenon has been hampered by the spatiotemporal constraints which most researchers face in the field. For this reason, it is often impossible to determine whether the absence of a particular individual at the site is caused by its dispersal beyond the area or by its death (see Greenwood and Harvey 1982;Lambrechts et al 1999;Marshall et al 2000;Hansson et al 2002;Forero et al 2002;Blums et al 2003;Winkler et al …”

Breeding dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape: the influence of habitat and nesting success in greater snow geese

“…When used in combination with information on habitat use, the recently developed multi-state capture-recapture models by Brownie et al (1993) now offer a powerful framework to examine these questions (e.g. Blums et al 2003;Cam et al 2004). We used this approach to study individual movement patterns across habitats of nesting greater snow geese (Anser caerulescens atlanticus).…”