1974
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-64-1201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Apple Leaf Scar Infection by Nectria galligena Conidia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
38
0
6

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
38
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Conference no significant differences were observed in the lesion incidences between the three methods applied. We further confirmed that inoculum dose is an important parameter for establishing infections, as documented earlier (Dubin and English 1974;Van de Weg 1989;Weber 2014). …”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Conference no significant differences were observed in the lesion incidences between the three methods applied. We further confirmed that inoculum dose is an important parameter for establishing infections, as documented earlier (Dubin and English 1974;Van de Weg 1989;Weber 2014). …”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…These injuries may be due to physiological changes due to the growth and development of plants or from the management techniques adopted. Scars caused by leaf fall in autumn are considered the most important natural openings for disease development (Dubin & English 1974;Latorre et al 2002;Weber 2014), but other injuries are also important, such as those resulting from pruning and harvesting. The objective of this study was to better understand the susceptibility of apple trees to N. ditissima infection throughout the year, under field conditions, in southern Brazil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inoculum control is a very important aspect in European canker disease control. As the number of spores on a wound increase, so does tissue susceptibility to infection (Dubin & English 1974b;Walter et al 2016). Inoculum control is primarily achieved by frequent and timely lesion removal, with ongoing monitoring required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%