Factors Affecting Agricultural Productivity among Arable Crop Farmers in Imo State, Nigeria

Abstract

The main objectives of the study were to examine and identify the factors that affect agricultural productivity in Imo State, Nigeria. The method of proportionate random sampling technique was used in selecting a sample of 99 farmers who were interviewed using validated, structured questionnaire. Primary data collected were analyzed using frequencies, means, and the Ordinary Least Squares multiple regression analysis technique. The results of the analysis show that the marginal value products estimated for farmland, planting materials, chemical fertilizer and labour are 0.0654, 0.0615, 0.0871 and 0.0831 respectively. Yam/cassava/maize/vegetable/melon combination was identified as the main crop combination practiced by the farmers in the state. Analysis of resource use efficiency shows that the farmers are highly efficient in the use of planting materials but highly inefficient in the use of land and chemical fertilizer. The results of the multiple linear regression analysis on the determinants of agricultural productivity show that age, level of education, years of farming experience, farm size, extension contact, fertilizer use, planting materials and labour use are the main determinants of agricultural productivity in the state. It is recommended that extension agents should teach farmers to use the right quality and

Fertilizer Subsidy and Rice Productivity in Ghana: A Microeconomic Study

“…This means that output of male farmers was 23.3% better than their female counterparts. The results from Table (3) also revealed that a 100% increase in farm size resulted in a 10.8% increase in output, corroborating with Ajah and Nmadu (2012) and Obasi et al (2013) that an increase in area of farm land cultivated resulted in an increase in crop output.…”

Household characteristics and market participation competence of smallholder farmers supplying cassava to starch processors in Nigeria

“…Eleven respondents (or 11.5%) did not fall into that category. The proportion compared favourably with the 82.0% and 83.8% of married farmers in other studies by Ibitoye and Onimisi (2013) and Obasi et al (2013), respectively. The analysis of respondents by whether they were full-time or part-time cassava farmers showed that only 32.29% was into cassava farming fulltime (Fig.…”

Environmental Determinants of Agricultural Output Among Members of Farmers Multipurpose Cooperative Societies in Ogbaru Local Government Area, Anambra State

“…β k X k + ei …………………………………….eq(2) Where: α = intercept Y = Farmers output (in kg).  1 - 10 =Regression coefficient ei = Error term designed to capture the effects of unspecified variables in the model X 1 = Urbanization (weighted mean of responses) X 2 = Pollution (weighted mean of responses) X 3 = Erosion (weighted mean of responses) X 4 = Flooding (weighted mean of responses) X 5 = Limited farm land (weighted mean of responses) X 6 = Land tenure (weighted mean of responses) X 7 = Rainfall (weighted mean of responses) X 8 = Temperature (weighted mean of responses) X 9 = Fire (weighted mean of responses) X 10 = Grazers (weighted mean of responses)  = Constant term The α and β S are the parameters for estimation and these are the error terms s.…”