2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2015.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization theory: From commutative to noncommutative settings

Abstract: Abstract. We study the non-uniqueness of factorizations of non zero-divisors into atoms (irreducibles) in noncommutative rings. To do so, we extend concepts from the commutative theory of non-unique factorizations to a noncommutative setting. Several notions of factorizations as well as distances between them are introduced. In addition, arithmetical invariants characterizing the non-uniqueness of factorizations such as the catenary degree, the ω-invariant, and the tame degree, are extended from commutative to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Main examples of transfer Krull monoids stem from non-commutative ring theory whence they are beyond the scope of this article. Nevertheless, we mention one example and refer the interested reader to [10,11,86,87] Our next theorem shows that, for the class of finitely generated Krull monoids, the finiteness result for the set of distances and for the set of catenary degrees as well as the structural result for sets of lengths (given in Theorems 3.1 and 5.5) are best possible. 3.…”
Section: Transfer Krull Monoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main examples of transfer Krull monoids stem from non-commutative ring theory whence they are beyond the scope of this article. Nevertheless, we mention one example and refer the interested reader to [10,11,86,87] Our next theorem shows that, for the class of finitely generated Krull monoids, the finiteness result for the set of distances and for the set of catenary degrees as well as the structural result for sets of lengths (given in Theorems 3.1 and 5.5) are best possible. 3.…”
Section: Transfer Krull Monoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For detailed algebraic discussions a lot of definitions (and notations) are necessary. Therefore we formulate most as a special case and refer to [CR94,CR99] for linear representations and [BS15] for the factorization for further information and literature. The factorization in free associative algebras is a natural generalization of that in the (ring of) integers Z.…”
Section: Free Associative Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the Krull monoids under consideration the main result in [18] states that (H) = c(H) holds under a certain mild assumption on the Davenport constant. Our starting point is the following Theorem A (the first statement follows from [19,Theorem 6.4.7], and the characterization of c(H) ∈ [3,4] is given in [18,Corollary 5.6]). …”
Section: G| ≤ 2 Suppose That |G| ≥ 3 Then the Davenport Constant Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then none of the two special cases holds true. By [17,Lemma 3.6], U V has a zero-sum subsequence W 1 ∈ A(G) of length |W 1 | ∈ [2,4], and suppose that |W 1 | is maximal. Then there is a factorization…”
Section: C(g)mentioning
confidence: 99%