2004
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/2/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization of Sturm–Liouville operators: solvable potentials and underlying algebraic structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which correspond to a problem with a position dependent mass; this is a particular example or factorization of Sturm-Liouville operators [59]. In this case we should look for two operators A and A + of the following form…”
Section: Schrödinger Factorization Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which correspond to a problem with a position dependent mass; this is a particular example or factorization of Sturm-Liouville operators [59]. In this case we should look for two operators A and A + of the following form…”
Section: Schrödinger Factorization Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the complications introduced by the generalizations, it is possible to find a first order formalism that is compatible with the equations that minimizes the action and govern the non-canonical system. Nevertheless, the generalized nature of the models makes a Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue equation [10] arise in the study of the linear stability, instead of the Schrödinger-like one as in the standard scenario. A possible manner to overcome this difficulty is to make a change of variables to transform this equation into a Schrödinger-like one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we introduce the SUSY QM factorization method [19] (and references therein), give the integrability condition, known as shape invariance condition, and define the associated generalized coherent states. Let H = L 2 (]a, b[, dx) be the Hilbert space with the inner product defined by :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%