2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-015-0634-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization of p-adic Rankin L-series

Abstract: We prove that the p-adic L-series of the tensor square of a p-ordinary modular form factors as the product of the symmetric square p-adic L-series of the form and a KubotaLeopoldt p-adic L-series. This establishes a generalization of a conjecture of Citro. Greenberg's exceptional zero conjecture for the adjoint follows as a corollary of our theorem.Our method of proof follows that of Gross, who proved a factorization result for the Katz p-adic L-series associated to the restriction of a Dirichlet character. Wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If εψ is not the trivial character, but maps p to 1, then we conclude that (for a suitable choice of c) we have exp * Gr 1 V (−k) c BF f ψ = 0 if and only ifL p (f , f , ψ)(k, k) = 0. It seems likely thatL p (f , f , ψ)(k, k) is never zero, and it may be possible to prove this using an adaptation of the methods of [Das16]. We hope to return to this issue in a future paper.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If εψ is not the trivial character, but maps p to 1, then we conclude that (for a suitable choice of c) we have exp * Gr 1 V (−k) c BF f ψ = 0 if and only ifL p (f , f , ψ)(k, k) = 0. It seems likely thatL p (f , f , ψ)(k, k) is never zero, and it may be possible to prove this using an adaptation of the methods of [Das16]. We hope to return to this issue in a future paper.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Complex L-functions. We introduce the various L-functions which we shall consider, following [Sch88,Das16]. For a prime ℓ ∤ N , we write…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the motive associated to f ⊗ f ⊗ χ does not possess any critical values and as a result, one may not appeal to non-vanishing statements for complex L-values to deduce the required non-triviality. However, Arlandini's work in progress (extending Dasgupta's result [Das16, Theorem 1] in the p-ordinary case) shows that the p-adic L-functions in question factors as a product of the symmetric square p-adic L-function and a Kubota-Leopoldt p-adic L-function. The required non-triviality easily follows from generic non-vanishing statements for symmetric square L-values; see Section 2.2 for details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Proof. According to [Das1,Section 3.2], we know that Besides, the assumptions we have fixed imply that dim L (V gh ) G Q = 0, and since the functional equation introduces no extra zero or pole at s = 1 (see [Das2]), we conclude that the order of vanishing at s = 1 is also 2.…”
Section: Beilinson-flach Elements and The Main Conjecturementioning
confidence: 93%