1983
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.28.1602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization of fragment-production cross sections in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this picture, Coulomb-induced break-up emerges, naturally, from the large impact parameters. Nuclear dissociation results, on the other hand, from a narrow band of grazing partial waves which -at very high bombarding energies -corresponds to impact parameters close to the sum of the radii of the colliding nuclei [7]. Note that this last sentence immediately suggests that the nuclear break-up cross sections should follow a A 1/3 -dependence on the target mass (which is also the prediction of the Serber model [8], based on purely geometrical arguments).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to this picture, Coulomb-induced break-up emerges, naturally, from the large impact parameters. Nuclear dissociation results, on the other hand, from a narrow band of grazing partial waves which -at very high bombarding energies -corresponds to impact parameters close to the sum of the radii of the colliding nuclei [7]. Note that this last sentence immediately suggests that the nuclear break-up cross sections should follow a A 1/3 -dependence on the target mass (which is also the prediction of the Serber model [8], based on purely geometrical arguments).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Light ions are produced by several mechanisms including nuclear abrasion, ablation, coalescence, cluster knockout, and electro-magnetic dissociation. In Table 1 we show contributions for several of these mechanisms for 16 O fragmentation on several targets and compare to the experimental data of Olsen et al [18]. Coalescence is predicted to be a dominant mechanism for d, t, h, and α-particle production.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…As a result of the present comparison the NUCFRG2 code has been modified to include Cucinotta's alpha knockout cross sections for 160 projectiles on all targets giving satisfactory agreement with the measurements of Olson et al (1983) as shown in Figure 5. The final NUCFRG2 cross sections are shown in comparison with those measured at GSI in Table I.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The nuclear interaction viewed as a combination of inelastic, quasielastic, and nonelastic events leads us to assume the main quasielastic event in which specific particles or clusters are removed from a reasonably stable core cannot be accommodated within a liquid drop formalism (Cucinotta and Dubey, 1994b;Cucinotta et al, 1994a) while the highly nonelastic events in which the mass removed from the projectile is fully dissociated is better represented by the NUCFRG2 code. One can see these dynamic differences in the 12C113C ratio in the fragmentation of 40At (ratio of 1) in comparison with the value for fragmentation of 160 (ratio of 2.3) as measured by Tall (1990); Olson et al (1983) respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation