2017
DOI: 10.1111/tops.12301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization of Force and Timing in Sensorimotor Performance: Long‐Range Correlation Properties of Two Different Task Goals

Abstract: Long-range correlations are often manifested in the form of 1/f b noise in a series of repeated measurements of the same neural or behavioral variable. Recent work has demonstrated that the magnitude and nature of these long-range correlations reliably capture individual differences and variation in task performance. In sensorimotor timing experiments, task characteristics such as tapping or circle drawing affect these long-range correlations during the production of isochronous time intervals. Such correlatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the resulting posterior was a multivariate t-distribution t(b|m, S L −1 , y), where b is the vector of regression coefficients, The validity of this setting is confirmed by the prior of the linear coefficient for L, namely, b L 1 . The estimate of b L 1 indeed coincides with the estimate of the scaling exponent γ, which has been shown to tend to unity by a vast corpus of behavioral studies (e.g., Balasubramaniam et al, 2018;Dotov et al, 2016;Fine et al, 2015;Gilden, 2001;Gilden et al, 1995;Hausdorff et al, 1995;Lemoine et al, 2006;Wijnants et al, 2009). In addition, γ → 1 is consistent with our setting b L 1 = 0.9.…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Mono-and Multifractality: Model Compa...supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Specifically, the resulting posterior was a multivariate t-distribution t(b|m, S L −1 , y), where b is the vector of regression coefficients, The validity of this setting is confirmed by the prior of the linear coefficient for L, namely, b L 1 . The estimate of b L 1 indeed coincides with the estimate of the scaling exponent γ, which has been shown to tend to unity by a vast corpus of behavioral studies (e.g., Balasubramaniam et al, 2018;Dotov et al, 2016;Fine et al, 2015;Gilden, 2001;Gilden et al, 1995;Hausdorff et al, 1995;Lemoine et al, 2006;Wijnants et al, 2009). In addition, γ → 1 is consistent with our setting b L 1 = 0.9.…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Mono-and Multifractality: Model Compa...supporting
confidence: 77%
“…When explicitly cueing force, an early experimental study found that greater variability of a finger-tapping sequence led to longer reaction times, and cueing greater force modulated the timing of taps around the target tap in a sequence (Semjen & Garcia-Colere, 1986). Cueing force and timing simultaneously revealed that performance on either task is internally consistent, but one does not predict performance on the other (Balasubramaniam et al, 2018), contrary to the view that periodic entrainment fixates other kinematic aspects of movement (Thaut et al, 2015). Moreover, the timing of taps appears most accurate not at initial contact, but at a point of peak force, a fraction of a second thereafter (Du et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of human behavior more broadly have shown 1/f fluctuation in tasks such as grip force [19], self-paced tapping/time estimation [2022], simultaneous force and time estimation [23], stride interval [24], synchronization tapping [25, 26], word naming [27], reaction times [28], other cognitive processes [3, 29], and also in brain activity during image observation [30]. 1/ f fluctuations are also seen in routine stable standing balance [31, 32], suggesting that this pattern of noise may be a fundamental aspect of the human cognitive and motor system, and compatible with healthy behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%