2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1706.07999
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization for stacks and boundary complexes

Abstract: We prove a weak factorization result on birational maps of Deligne-Mumford stacks, and deduce the following: Let U ⊂ X be an open embedding of smooth Deligne-Mumford stacks such that D = X − U is a normal crossings divisor, then the the simple homotopy type of the boundary complex ∆(X, D) depends only on U .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many applications involve the fact that the homotopy types (and even simple homotopy types) of boundary complexes, the dual complexes of boundary divisors in simple normal crossings compactifications, are independent of the choice of compactification. The same is also true for Deligne-Mumford (DM) stacks [Har17]. Boundary complexes were introduced and studied by Danilov in the 1970s [Dan75], and have become an important focus of research activity in the past few years, with new connections to Berkovich spaces, singularity theory, geometric representation theory, and the minimal model program.…”
Section: Boundary Complexesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Many applications involve the fact that the homotopy types (and even simple homotopy types) of boundary complexes, the dual complexes of boundary divisors in simple normal crossings compactifications, are independent of the choice of compactification. The same is also true for Deligne-Mumford (DM) stacks [Har17]. Boundary complexes were introduced and studied by Danilov in the 1970s [Dan75], and have become an important focus of research activity in the past few years, with new connections to Berkovich spaces, singularity theory, geometric representation theory, and the minimal model program.…”
Section: Boundary Complexesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…for the (p + 1)-fold iterated fiber product. Define D([p]) ⊂ D [p] as the open subvariety consisting of (p + 1)-tuples of pairwise distinct points in D [p] that all lie over the same point of D. We can then define ∆(D)( If X is proper then the simple homotopy type of this dual complex depends only on the open complement X D [Pay13,Har17], and its reduced rational homology is naturally identified with the top weight cohomology of X D. More precisely, if X has pure dimension d, then (6.1.1)…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is briefly mentioned in [Ber17] as Corollary 1.5. Since then, a stronger result by Harper [Har17] on weak factorization of Deligne-Mumford stacks based on destackification has appeared, which makes our result less relevant. Instead of discussing our previous result further, we simply restate Harper's theorem as Theorem D. We also give a minor simplification of its proof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%