1987
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1987.61.3.811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial Validity of Merz's Psychological Reactance Scale

Abstract: Merz's Psychological Reactance Scale was translated from German and based on responses of 218 college students. Via factor analysis with principal factors followed by a Direct Quartimin rotation, researchers noted an orthogonal two-factor solution which contrasts with Merz's four and suggests thorough psychometric work is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For a measure to be valuable it must have internal consistency, external consistency or validity, and be replicable. Per the analyses of Merz (1983), Tucker and Byers (1987)) Thomas, et al (2001)) and Hong and colleagues. Hong's Psychological Reactance Scale does not seem to measure a reliable construct.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a measure to be valuable it must have internal consistency, external consistency or validity, and be replicable. Per the analyses of Merz (1983), Tucker and Byers (1987)) Thomas, et al (2001)) and Hong and colleagues. Hong's Psychological Reactance Scale does not seem to measure a reliable construct.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The scale was translated from German to English by Tucker and Byers (1987).' According to Tucker and Byers this translated version yielded only two poorly loading factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International interest in reactance is evidenced by the development of measures of this construct by psychologists in Germany, Australia, and the United States (e.g., Dowd, Milne, & Wise, 1991;Hong & Page, 1989;Merz, 1983, as cited in Tucker & Byers, 1987). Using samples of participants from around the world, reactance has been related to several important variables.…”
Section: An Example and Overview Of Psychological Reactance In Low-stmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Właściwość ta nie jest uwzględniana w praktyce tworzenia narzędzi pomiaru przeciwstawiania się. Spotkać się raczej można z koncentracją na świadomości oraz celowości zachowań osoby i jej otoczenia (Oleszkowicz, 2001;Bukobza, 2009), formie wyrazu sprzeciwu (Dowd, Milne, Wise, 1991;Oleszkowicz, 2001), natężeniu potrzeby niezależności (Tucker, Byers, 1987;Dowd, Milne, Wise, 1991;Hong, Faed, 1996;Stanik, Roszkowska, Kucharewicz, 2006), stra-tegii radzenia sobie z ograniczeniami (Ostrowska, 2002), statusie uczestników relacji, proaktywności i reaktywności zachowań (McDermott, 1988;Bukobza, 2009), stopniu uzewnętrznienia, a także skutkach tych zachowań, w tym zaletach i korzyściach dla osoby i otoczenia (Stenner, Marshall, 1995;Oleszkowicz, 2001;Bukobza, 2009). Uwzględnienie więc "akceptacji", rozumianej w myśl wcześniej podanej definicji, wydaje się nie tylko teoretycznie zasadne, ale także interesujące, choćby przez wzgląd na dotychczasowe jej niedocenianie w praktyce budowania narzędzi pomiaru oporu.…”
unclassified