2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial validation analysis of the Baby and Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaires in Samoa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Testing in different populations has at times largely confirmed the factor structure of the original CEBQ [ 69 ], but studies with diverse samples from a range of countries [ 70 – 77 ] have revealed poorer fits or variations from the original factor structure, suggesting that they may not reflect common underlying processes or that there are theoretical weaknesses in the conceptualisation of the constructs. Oyama et al [ 71 ] could not replicate the factor structure of the CEBQ or BEBQ in a Samoan sample, and speculated that the wording of the questions could at least partly explain cross-cultural differences, but also that the appetitive traits measured by the CEBQ may suffer from being theoretically indistinct. It is also possible that there are cultural or individual differences in word meanings or images generated by the questions, a potential difficulty associated with questionnaires [ 78 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing in different populations has at times largely confirmed the factor structure of the original CEBQ [ 69 ], but studies with diverse samples from a range of countries [ 70 – 77 ] have revealed poorer fits or variations from the original factor structure, suggesting that they may not reflect common underlying processes or that there are theoretical weaknesses in the conceptualisation of the constructs. Oyama et al [ 71 ] could not replicate the factor structure of the CEBQ or BEBQ in a Samoan sample, and speculated that the wording of the questions could at least partly explain cross-cultural differences, but also that the appetitive traits measured by the CEBQ may suffer from being theoretically indistinct. It is also possible that there are cultural or individual differences in word meanings or images generated by the questions, a potential difficulty associated with questionnaires [ 78 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Baby Eating Behavior Questionnaire (BEBQ; Llewellyn et al, 2011 ) is an 18-item parent-report questionnaire used to assess appetitive characteristics of young children. The BEBQ is derived from the validated, widely used CEBQ and has been psychometrically validated in healthy populations ( Hunot-Alexander et al, 2021 ; Oyama et al, 2021 ). The BEBQ comprises a single-item construct General Appetite (e.g., My baby had a big appetite) as well as four subscales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BEBQ consists of 18 questions ranked on a 5-point Likert scale: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, or Always. The questionnaire has been used in previous research in Samoa by the OLaGA research team, validated for the population PLOS ONE [39], and has been previously translated into Samoan. See Table 2 for more information on questionnaire and survey contents.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%