2023
DOI: 10.1177/09622802231215805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial survival analysis for treatment effects under dependent censoring

Takeshi Emura,
Marc Ditzhaus,
Dennis Dobler
et al.

Abstract: Factorial analyses offer a powerful nonparametric means to detect main or interaction effects among multiple treatments. For survival outcomes, for example, from clinical trials, such techniques can be adopted for comparing reasonable quantifications of treatment effects. The key difficulty to solve in survival analysis concerns the proper handling of censoring. So far, all existing factorial analyses for survival data have been developed under the independent censoring assumption, which is too strong for many… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For survival data, the follow-up period is often limitted. When a subject survives longer than the follow-up period, one may treat the survival time of the subject as equal to the follow-up period ( [5], [39], [40]). In this section, we assume that every subject has a common follow-up time τ.…”
Section: Computing P With Follow-up Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For survival data, the follow-up period is often limitted. When a subject survives longer than the follow-up period, one may treat the survival time of the subject as equal to the follow-up period ( [5], [39], [40]). In this section, we assume that every subject has a common follow-up time τ.…”
Section: Computing P With Follow-up Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For survival data, the follow-up period is often limited. When a subject survives longer than the follow-up period, one may treat the survival time of the subject as equal to the follow-up period [6,43,44]. This means that we define the Mann-Whitney effect for min(T 1 , τ) and min(T 2 , τ).…”
Section: Computing P With Follow-up Timementioning
confidence: 99%