Factorial structure of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders

Abstract

Purpose Subjective quality of life is a central patient-reported outcome in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) is an established and widely used instrument for its assessment. The present study is a secondary analysis of large schizophrenia studies and aims to establish the factorial structure of the MANSA with a rigorous two-step methodology. Methods A sample of 3120 patients was randomly split into two datasets; the first includes two thirds of the patients and serves as the calibration sample (N = 2071) and the second includes one third of them and serves as the validation sample (N = 1049). We performed an exploratory factor analysis with the calibration sample followed by a confirmatory factor analysis with the validation sample. Results Our results for both samples revealed a model with adequate fit comprising two factors. The first factor encompasses eight items measuring satisfaction with a variety of life and health-related aspects of quality of life, whereas the second consists of four items assessing satisfaction with living environment comprising living alone or with others, accommodation, family, and safety. These two factors correlate in a different way with socio-demographic characteristics such as age and living conditions. Conclusions Future trials and service evaluation projects using the MANSA to measure quality of life should take into account that satisfaction with living environment may be distinct from satisfaction with other life and health-related aspects of quality of life.

Individual Placement and Support for persons with alcohol and drug addiction in a Swedish context (IPS-ADAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

“…Higher scores indicate better QoL. MANSA has sound psychometric properties and is widely used [ 75 , 76 ].…”

A cross-sectional study addressing the importance of work and other everyday activities for well-being among people with mental illness: does additional vulnerability matter?

“…Higher scores thus indicate better quality of life. A recent study concluded that the items form two factors [ 40 ]. One concerns “life and health-related aspects”, encompassing items pertaining to life as a whole, mental health, physical, leisure activities, friendships, employment situation, financial situation, and sex life.…”

Are COVID-19’s restrictive measures associated with people’s quality of life and the prevalence of anxiety and depression in Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of Congo?

“…Also, participants reported satisfaction with the quality and quantity of friendships, measured using the sixteen items of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA), which was rated on a score from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). MANSA is a reliable measure and has been used to assess the quality of life of people with mental health conditions (5,27,28). Two direct COVID-19-related questions were asked to participants to know how the coronavirus pandemic affected the amount of contact they have with people outside of their homes.…”