2015
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1007086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial experimental design for treatment of an industrial wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration

Abstract: In the present study, micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) using linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) surfactant was applied in order to treat soft drink processing wastewater. The effects of two parameters of LAS surfactant concentration and transmembrane pressure (TMP) on the separation performance and flux were studied by applying a full factorial design. It was found that LAS concentration and TMP had negative and positive effect on the flux, respectively. The results showed that the optimum TMP for rej… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8. As can be observed, the predicted values were in reasonable agreement with the experimental data, further confirming the high predictive power of the model in the range of experimental values considered for the factors [79].…”
Section: Effect Of Input Variables On Spf and Sresupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8. As can be observed, the predicted values were in reasonable agreement with the experimental data, further confirming the high predictive power of the model in the range of experimental values considered for the factors [79].…”
Section: Effect Of Input Variables On Spf and Sresupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Regarding these tables, the model Fvalues for the SPF and SRE were 111.37 and 312.31, respectively. These values indicate that the models are statistically significant, and there is only less than 0.01% chance that these levels-of-fi t can occur due to random chance and noise [50,79,80]. P-values less than 0.05 indicate that the model terms are significant.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deficiency of this statistic parameter is that it always increases with the addition of the new variables in the process, without considering the fact that the added variables are statistically significant or not (Azizi Namaghi et al, 2015). To overcome this problem, the adjusted R 2 is used in order to evaluate the model performance, since it is regulated based on the model size, that is, the number of factors (Azizi Namaghi et al, 2015; Azizi Namaghi & Mousavi, 2016). According to Table 5, R 2 and adjusted‐ R 2 values for the models are close to each other and have no significant difference, indicating that in significant terms have not been included in the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adept Precision (AP) represents the ratio of the difference between the maximum and minimum and predicted values to the average standard deviation of all predicted values. It serves as a measure of the signal−to−noise ratio, and an AP value higher than four is considered desirable [45]. In this investigation, the AP values are 7.773 and 10, respectively, indicating an adequate signal level.…”
Section: Parameter Optimization Of the Starch Compositesmentioning
confidence: 86%