2014
DOI: 10.46469/mq.2014.55.1.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Structure of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition (WISC – III) among Gifted Students in the Sudan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A skeptic of g could postulate that our results are a statistical artifact of the decisions we used to conduct a factor analysis. Some data sets in our study had been subjected to EFA in the past, and the results often differed from ours (Attallah et al, 2014; Bulatao & Reyes-Juan, 1968; Church, Katigbak, & Almario-Velazco, 1985; Conant et al, 1999; Dasen, 1984; Dawson, 1967b; Elwan, 1996; Guthrie, 1963; Humble & Dixon, 2017; Irvine, 1964; Kearney, 1966; Lean & Clements, 1981; McFie, 1961; Miezah, 2015; Orbell, 1981; Rasheed et al, 2017; Ruffieux et al, 2010; Sen, Jensen, Sen, & Arora, 1983; Sukhatunga et al, 2002; van den Briel et al, 2000; Warburton, 1951). In response, we wish to emphasize that we chose procedures a priori that are modern methods accepted among experts in factor analysis (e.g., Fabrigar et al, 1999; Larsen & Warne, 2010; Thompson, 2004; Warne & Larsen, 2014).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A skeptic of g could postulate that our results are a statistical artifact of the decisions we used to conduct a factor analysis. Some data sets in our study had been subjected to EFA in the past, and the results often differed from ours (Attallah et al, 2014; Bulatao & Reyes-Juan, 1968; Church, Katigbak, & Almario-Velazco, 1985; Conant et al, 1999; Dasen, 1984; Dawson, 1967b; Elwan, 1996; Guthrie, 1963; Humble & Dixon, 2017; Irvine, 1964; Kearney, 1966; Lean & Clements, 1981; McFie, 1961; Miezah, 2015; Orbell, 1981; Rasheed et al, 2017; Ruffieux et al, 2010; Sen, Jensen, Sen, & Arora, 1983; Sukhatunga et al, 2002; van den Briel et al, 2000; Warburton, 1951). In response, we wish to emphasize that we chose procedures a priori that are modern methods accepted among experts in factor analysis (e.g., Fabrigar et al, 1999; Larsen & Warne, 2010; Thompson, 2004; Warne & Larsen, 2014).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The average first factor explained 45.9% of variance ( SD = 12.9%), with a median of 44.4%. The weakest first factor accounted for 18.3% of variance (Attallah, Ahmed, & Meisenberg, 2014), while the strongest first factor accounted for 86.3% of observed variable variance (Rehna & Hanif, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%