Factor structure of the Serbian version of the Children's Communication Checklist-2

Glumbić, Nenad; Brojčin, Branislav

doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.03.010

Cited by 16 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Cross-cultural consistency in terms of the validity of the GCC should be tested with languages other than English and Japanese, because factor analysis showed that the Serbian CCC-2 had three factors ("General Communication Ability", "Pragmatics", and "Structural Language Aspects"), which accounted for only 29.39% of the total variance (Glumbić & Brojčin, 2012).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This modified version has demonstrated internal consistency for Japanese children (Cronbach's α = .533 to .761) (Tsukidate et al, 2015). Cronbach's α is lower than the original UK version (α = .661 to .804) when the CCC-2 is translated into languages other than Norwegian (Helland, Biringer, Helland, & Heimann, 2009), including Dutch (Geurts & Embrechts, 2008), Serbian (Glumbić & Brojčin, 2012), and Québec French (Vézina, Sylvestre, & Fossard, 2013). The Japanese version was used in this study for children aged 3 to 15 years.…”

Section: Measures the Children's Communication Checklist-2 (Ccc-2)mentioning

confidence: 94%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quantitative Aspects of Communicative Impairment Ascertained in a Large National Survey of Japanese Children

Fujino

Tsukidate

et al. 2017

J Autism Dev Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Japanese version of the Children's Communication Checklist-2 (CCC-2) was rated by caregivers in a large national population sample of 22,871 children aged 3-15 years. The General Communication Composite (GCC) of the CCC-2 exhibited a distribution with a single-factor structure. The GCC distribution between autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and language impairment (LI) groups in the general population fit inside a bell curve with significant overlap with the general population, and a continuum was evident between groups. No evidence of a natural cutoff that would differentiate categorically affected from unaffected children was seen. The Social Interaction Deviance Composite (SIDC) supported the notion that ASD and LI are on the opposite endpoints of a SIDC continuum of communication impairment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Measures the Children's Communication Checklist-2 (Ccc-2)mentioning

confidence: 94%

Quantitative Aspects of Communicative Impairment Ascertained in a Large National Survey of Japanese Children

Fujino

Tsukidate

et al. 2017

J Autism Dev Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En definitiva, manifiestan dificulta-des para usar el lenguaje con fines sociales; adaptarse al contexto y al oyente; seguir las normas de conversación y narración; y comprender el lenguaje implícito [8,9,32]. El análisis factorial de los ítems del cuestionario CCC traducidos al castellano aporta nuevas agrupaciones de acuerdo con su contenido, con algunas diferencias respecto al cuestionario original en inglés, como sucede en otras adaptaciones del instrumento a otros idiomas [27,33]. La versión española la constituyen tres factores: pragmática, relación social e intereses; dentro de la primera hay cinco dimensiones: habilidades conversacionales, coherencia-comprensión, compenetración, comunicación no verbal y pertinencia.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Naturalmente, las baterías más amplias diseñadas para evaluar los TEA suelen incluir un apartado de uso social del lenguaje, pero no serán mencionadas aquí, al no ser su contexto apropiado. La CCC es un instrumento muy conocido y tanto su primera edición inglesa como la segunda se han revalidado en muy distintos ambientes lingüístico-culturales: Brasil [21], Tailandia [22], Países Bajos [23,24], Noruega [25,26], Serbia [27], etc. En nuestro país se ha traducido y adaptado al español [28], aunque no se ha validado ni baremado anteriormente.…”

Section: Cómo Citar Este Artículounclassified

La adaptación al castellano de la Children’s Communication Checklist permite detectar las dificultades en el uso pragmático del lenguaje y diferenciar subtipos clínicos

Crespo-Eguílaz¹,

Magallón²,

Sánchez-Carpintero³

et al. 2016

RevNeurol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Serbia, there is no screening instrument developed for children at the earliest age. The Children's Communication Checklist-2(CCC-2), which may be used for ASD screening, is only available in Serbian, but for children aged 4 years and above [8]. This study had two aims.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early screening for autism spectrum disorder in Serbia: A pilot study of screening instruments for parents and child care workers

Stupar¹,

Lakic²,

Jančić³

et al. 2015

Engrami

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can lead to early interventions, which may improve developmental and academic outcomes in children with ASD. Early screening is thus of significant importance. Aims: This study had two aims. First, it was aimed to translate into Serbian five screening instruments for ASD: Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised, (M-CHAT-R), Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT), Infant-Toddler Checklist (ITC), and Early Screening Autistic Traits Questionnaire (ESAT) for parents and the Checklist for Early Signs of Developmental Disorders (CESDD) for child care workers. Second, it was aimed to test the feasibility of the included data from parents and child care workers in early ASD screening. Methods: The translation and cultural adaptation process included standardized forward and backward translation with pilot testing. For screening within a childcare setting, one day-care center was selected. Data from at least one parent and a child care worker were collected for 47 children aged 28.94 months on average (SD = 8.39). Results: The face and content validity of each version of the instruments is satisfactory. The correlations among the scores showed that the ESET, M-CHAT-R, Q-CHAT, and ITC evaluate slightly different aspects of ASD. The M-CHAT covers similar aspects to the CESDD. Eight (17%) children were positively screened for ASD with at least one instrument. All positively screened with the ESAT, Q-CHAT, or ITC were also positive with the CESDD, while not all positively screened with M-CHAT-R were detected with the CESDD. All five instruments were able to detect the child with confirmed ASD in the final stage-clinical assessment. Conclusions: All five screening instruments are targeting ASD symptoms at early stage of life in our population. It is feasible to include reports from parents and child care workers in early ASD screening and there is an added value of combining data from the two.

show abstract

Factor structure of the Serbian version of the Children's Communication Checklist-2

Cited by 16 publications

References 25 publications

Quantitative Aspects of Communicative Impairment Ascertained in a Large National Survey of Japanese Children

Quantitative Aspects of Communicative Impairment Ascertained in a Large National Survey of Japanese Children

La adaptación al castellano de la Children’s Communication Checklist permite detectar las dificultades en el uso pragmático del lenguaje y diferenciar subtipos clínicos

Early screening for autism spectrum disorder in Serbia: A pilot study of screening instruments for parents and child care workers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About