2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor structure of the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in breast cancer patients

Abstract: The results support the PSQI's original unidimensional structure, demonstrating that the PSQI global score is a valid and parsimonious measure for assessing and screening sleep dysfunction in cancer patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
72
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Factor analytical studies of the PSQI have mostly found a single factor although some studies have reported a three factor model [12][13][14][15]. In many studies ''use of sleep medications'' did not load well into the one factor model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor analytical studies of the PSQI have mostly found a single factor although some studies have reported a three factor model [12][13][14][15]. In many studies ''use of sleep medications'' did not load well into the one factor model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The model results are similar to previous factor analyses that also found that a 3-factor model (Sleep Efficiency, Perceived Sleep Quality, Daily Disturbances) best fit the data in depressed and non-depressed adults, 15 520 Nigerian university students, 13 135 post-renal transplant patients, 14 and 3,667 community-dwelling English and Spanish speaking Hispanic and non-Hispanic adults. 16 Conversely, the traditional 1-factor (Sleep Quality) and 2-factor models (Sleep Efficiency; Perceived Sleep Quality) consisted of samples of 197 Chinese women with breast cancer, 19 417 depressed and non-depressed older adults, 15 107 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 17 and 1174 non-depressed breast cancer survivors. 18 Two of the prior studies also produced a better model fit by removing the sleep medication item during the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sleep Efficiency, Perceived Sleep Quality, and Daytime Functioning) was a better fit to the data than a 1-factor global score for sleep quality. 1316 One study found a 1-factor model (Sleep Quality) 19 and two studies reported 2-factor models (Sleep Efficiency, Perceived Sleep Quality) were most appropriate for the populations being studied. 17,18 The Otte et al study also found racial differences in a nested-model comparison of African American and Caucasian breast cancer survivors of Sleep Quality and Sleep Latency as well as Sleep Efficiency and Sleep Quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sleep quality was assessed with the Chinese Version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) as reported in previous studies (Guo, Sun, Liu, & Wu, 2016;Ho & Fong, 2014). Regarding the structure and scoring system, the Chinese version of PSQI was the same with the traditional PSQI proposed by Buysse et al (Buysse et al, 1989) It is composed of seven different components including subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, habitual sleep efficiency, night-time disturbances, sleep duration, use of sleep medications and daytime dysfunction.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of these components generates a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with the higher score indicating the worse sleep quality. Poor sleep quality was defined as a global score of ≥ 8 (Guo et al, 2016;Ho & Fong, 2014). In addition to PSQI, Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue Scale (MAF) was also completed by the patient to evaluate the extent of fatigue.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%