2007
DOI: 10.1177/02711214070270030501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Interrater Reliability of the Early Childhood Behavior Problem Screening Scale

Abstract: The current study examined the initial psychometrics of the Early Childhood Behavior Problem Screening Scale (ECBPSS; Epstein & Nelson, 2006), namely the factor structure and associated internal consistency of factor items of parent and teacher versions as well as interrater reliability. Data came from samples of preschool- and kindergarten-age children from 2 medium-size cities in the U.S. midwest. Separate analyses of the parent and teacher data revealed internalizing and externalizing factors, with Cron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ECBPSS includes a teacher and parent form, each with 12 items that use a 4-point Likert-type scale that ranges from 0 (not at all like my child) to 3 (very much like my child). Initial investigations of reliability and convergent validity are promising (Griffith, Nelson, Epstein, & Pederson, 2008;Nelson, Epstein, Griffith, & Harper, 2007).…”
Section: Fig 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECBPSS includes a teacher and parent form, each with 12 items that use a 4-point Likert-type scale that ranges from 0 (not at all like my child) to 3 (very much like my child). Initial investigations of reliability and convergent validity are promising (Griffith, Nelson, Epstein, & Pederson, 2008;Nelson, Epstein, Griffith, & Harper, 2007).…”
Section: Fig 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best practice recommendations encourage clinicians to consider information from multiple sources when evaluating problems in youth; however, most multiple‐informant measures have not demonstrated strong interrater reliability . Informant discrepancies may be due to divergent perspectives on whether behaviours are contextually limited versus consistent, developmentally appropriate versus atypical, or purposeful versus involuntary .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the assumptions, items, measures, and data collection processes of these tools differs, their common point is to identify the deficiencies, problems, and pathologies of the children and to provide a basis to decision makers by providing them the necessary information (Lappalainen, Savolainen, Kuorelahti, & Epstein, 2009, p. 746;Epstein, Ryser, & Pearson, 2002, p. 208). Nelson, Epstein, Griffith, and Hopper (2007) claimed that evaluation tools and screening scales aimed at children should meet some basic criteria. According to Walker, Ramsey, and Gresham (2004), screening scales should be short and easily applicable (Walker et al, 2004, as cited in Nelson et al, 2007.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scale consists of two sub-dimensions and two questionnaires for collecting the evaluations of teachers and parents regarding the children (Nelson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%