2007
DOI: 10.1177/1077801207305933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Structure and Validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales for Spanish Women

Abstract: This study focused on the factor structure of the victimization form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). A sample of 1,266 women participated in the study, including a subgroup of battered women. Results of confirmatory factor analysis supported a model that integrates the five original scales with the severity of violence (minor, severe). In addition, the distinction between minor and severe forms of violence was supported by correlations between subscales. Except for minor injury, all of the scale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
31
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The annual frequency is computed by adding up the assumed midpoints in the response categories (0 00, 1 01, 2 02, 304, 4 08, 5 015, and 6025) and by recoding value 7 to be 0 (Straus et al, 1996). The Spanish version of the CTS2 has shown excellent internal consistency for scales and confirmation of the factor structure (Calvete, Corral, & Estévez, 2007). In this study alpha coefficient was 0.93.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The annual frequency is computed by adding up the assumed midpoints in the response categories (0 00, 1 01, 2 02, 304, 4 08, 5 015, and 6025) and by recoding value 7 to be 0 (Straus et al, 1996). The Spanish version of the CTS2 has shown excellent internal consistency for scales and confirmation of the factor structure (Calvete, Corral, & Estévez, 2007). In this study alpha coefficient was 0.93.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The CTS2 is one of the most widely used instruments to assess aggression and conflict within intimate relationships [47,51-54]. The instrument consists of 78 items assessing both perpetration of violence and also victimization; the present study uses only the 39 items relating specifically to women’s victimization experiences [53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items are summed and converted into five conflict resolution subscales: psychological aggression, sexual coercion, negation, physical assaults, and injury experiences [23]. These scales examine actions taken to settle a disagreement (negotiation); acts of verbal and non-verbal aggression (psychological aggression); physical violence (physical assault); unwanted sexual activity (sexual coercion), and; physical pain or injury requiring medical attention (injury) [51]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies on its prevalence in dating relationships seem to confirm that violence arises at the beginning of relationships, although the most frequent form of aggression in this period is milder and is not of a physical nature [5]. Nevertheless, psychological abuse has been studies to a lesser extent compared to physical abuse [6], although it also has serious consequences on the well-being of its victims [7] [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it does not include other important forms of partner abuse, such as cutting the partner off his/her family or friends, controlling access to money, etc. [7]. From a feminist point of view, intimate partner violence has been conceptualised as a mechanism of control and subjugation used by men against their partners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%