2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor structure and validity of the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale – Third Edition (ECERS-3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
18
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall ECTS-3 scores, learn-ing opportunities, and teacher interaction were positively associated with the growth of control functions, as were all three areas of CLASS Pre-K. The results showed the value of a tool for assessing the quality of preschool education [11].…”
Section: Interaction Within the Preschool Organization Aimed At High Education Qualitymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Overall ECTS-3 scores, learn-ing opportunities, and teacher interaction were positively associated with the growth of control functions, as were all three areas of CLASS Pre-K. The results showed the value of a tool for assessing the quality of preschool education [11].…”
Section: Interaction Within the Preschool Organization Aimed At High Education Qualitymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Our results suggest that the ECERS-R and ECERS-3 were only modestly correlated which does not allow for easy translation between the instruments. For example, the correlation between the two versions of the ECERS is about the same as between either of them, and the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Early et al, 2018; Pianta et al, 2008), another widely used early childhood classroom quality measure. Thus, while the ECERS-R and ECERS-3 are measuring some common characteristics, they are distinct tools that cannot be used interchangeably.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on the ECERS-R indicates that the Scale contains two factors: Activities/Materials and Language/Interactions (Cassidy et al, 2005) or Provisions for Learning and Teaching and Interactions (Clifford et al, 2005). More recently, researchers have found that a four-factor solution offered the best fit for the ECERS-3: Learning Opportunities, Gross Motor, Teacher Interactions , and Math Activities (Early et al, 2018). The sample size in the current study did not support this level of analysis, but it would be interesting to see if these factors were replicated when the data were collected in the same rooms at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All components of good ECE management are linked to procedures and activities carried out consistently, effectively, and efficiently to support learning and meet the needs of students. ECE quality, according to Magnuson and Shager (2010), Freeman et al (2014) and Early, et al (2018), is measured from two aspects, namely structural and process aspects. The structural aspects of the ECE program are easy to measure and manage and affect children's development indirectly by shaping everyday experiences in the classroom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%