2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor structure and reliability of the Hungarian version of the Illness Intrusiveness Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The validity and reliability of the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale have been established in patients with medical and surgical conditions. 15,16,19,26,27 The DASH is a 30-item questionnaire that assesses disability. Each item is ranked on a 5-point scale.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity and reliability of the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale have been established in patients with medical and surgical conditions. 15,16,19,26,27 The DASH is a 30-item questionnaire that assesses disability. Each item is ranked on a 5-point scale.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 2, the items loading on Factor 1 were very different from those that loaded on the "instrumental" factor when extracted using data provided by Western respondents [9,13,16]. The factor observed in the present study combines items that loaded on all three factors in the Western data.…”
Section: Exploratory Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This value of interdependence and harmony with others, rather than individualism, may be more typical of Asians. Cross-cultural variations in construct validity of many psychometric-based health outcome measures have been well recognized in the literature [6,13,23,24,[30][31][32], particularly between Western countries and China, which may be partially explained by differences in the Western individualism and the Chinese collectivism culture [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations