2008
DOI: 10.1177/1073191108315548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Structure and Correlates of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a Large Offender Sample

Abstract: The authors examined the psychometric properties, factor structure, and construct validity of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) in a large offender sample (N = 1,515). Although the DES is widely used with community and clinical samples, minimal work has examined offender samples. Participants were administered self-report and interview measures, and a subsample was followed longitudinally to determine criminal and violent recidivism. The DES exhibited good psychometric properties, but an identified thre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with evidence suggesting that dissociation is a common sequela of adverse and/or traumatic life experiences, many empirical studies have demonstrated that individuals with SMIs exposed to childhood adversity (e.g. sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, bullying), experience greater dissociation compared to individuals exposed to little or no trauma . However, the relationship between childhood trauma and dissociation in individuals with SMIs remains contradictory, as some studies have found no association between the two constructs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In line with evidence suggesting that dissociation is a common sequela of adverse and/or traumatic life experiences, many empirical studies have demonstrated that individuals with SMIs exposed to childhood adversity (e.g. sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, bullying), experience greater dissociation compared to individuals exposed to little or no trauma . However, the relationship between childhood trauma and dissociation in individuals with SMIs remains contradictory, as some studies have found no association between the two constructs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Unfortunately, studies exploring the factor structure of the DES-II yielded contrasting results, failing to provide consistent support for a specific conceptual model. Carlson and Putnam [10] provided initial evidence for a three-factor model, which was repeatedly found in some studies using exploratory (EFA) or confirmatory (CFA) factor analysis [6,[15][16][17][18][19]. However, using principal component analysis (PCA), Ray and colleagues [20] identified seven factors underlying the DES-II items.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a whole, the inconsistency in the DES-II factor structure across studies and samples, as well as the high degree of shared variance among the factors, have led some authors to suggest that the instrument may actually capture a unidimensional operationalization of the dissociation construct [6,8,14,26,[29][30][31]. Moreover, such contrasting results raise the possible risk of making misleading inferences about the construct of dissociation based on findings derived from the use of the original subscales reported by Carlson and Putnam [10] using the traditional Classical Test Theory (CTT) approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a closer look at the dissociation literature, one could conclude that there is a disproportion of samples recruited, with a landslide majority of studies involving clinical, community, and student samples (e.g., Evren et al, 2013;Foote, Smolin, Kaplan, Legatt, & Lipschitz, 2006; Gutiérrez Wang, Cosden, & Bernal, 2011;Maaranen, 2008;Maaranen et al, 2005;Van Dissociation in Italian and Portuguese inmates 4 IJzendoorn, 1996;Vogel, Spitzer, Barnow, Freyberger, & Grabe, 2006;Xiao et al, 2006;Yoshizumi, Murase, Murakami, & Takai, 2007), and only a handful of them addressing dissociation in offender samples (Dietrich, 2003;Lancaster, Compton, White, Bowers, & Herring, 1998; D. O. Lewis, Yeager, Swica, Pincus, & Lewis, 1997;Mitchell, 2006;Ruiz, Poythress, Liliane, & Douglas, 2008;Stefano Ciulla & Caretti, 2012;Walker, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%