Factor Market Distortions Across Time, Space and Sectors in China

Abstract

In this paper we measure the distortions in the allocation of labor and capital across provinces and sectors in China for the period 1985-2007. Most existing studies have measured factor market distortions by using some index of dispersion in individual factor returns. However, the map between these dispersion measures and the efficiency loss due to distortions is not clear, especially when there is more than one factor. In this paper, we follow Hsieh and Klenow (2009)'s strategy by measuring the factor market distortions as the reduction in aggregate TFP due to distortions. We extend their analysis by decomposing the overall distortions into between-province and within-province inter-sectoral distortions. We find: (1) For the period between 1985 and 2007, the distortions in factor allocation reduced aggregate TFP by about 31% on average, with the within-province distortions accounting for more than half of the reduction; (2) the measure of between-province distortions was relatively constant over the period; (3) the measure of within-province distortions declined between 1985 and 1997, contributing to 0.96% TFP growth per year, but then increased significantly in the last ten years, reducing the aggregate TFP growth rate by 1.41% a year; and (4) almost all of the within-province distortions can be accounted for by the misallocation of capital between the state and the non-state sectors.

Regional Competition in China under the Price Distortion of Construction Land: A Study Based on a Two‐regime Spatial Durbin Model

“…Studies have also shown that several government interventions in Chinese factor markets have slowed down the progress of market reforms (Jovanovic, 2014). Although price distortion and the resource misallocation of production factors, such as capital, labor and energy, could reduce total factor productivity and lead to lower output, they have become the main approaches of local governments in regional competition (Hsieh and Klenow, 2009;Aoki, 2012;Brandt et al, 2013;Restuccia and Rogerson, 2013). However, no study has yet investigated the role of construction land, which is also an important production factor in China.…”

Resource Allocation, Structural Change, and the Dynamics of Manufacturing Productivity in Indonesia

“…Decomposing aggregate TFP growth in Singapore for the period 1965-2002, Akkemik (2005 shows that resource reallocations account for a large portion of this improvement in aggregate TFP growth. China's fast economic development has also attracted emerging studies to discuss its own industrial transformation, but these studies reach inconsistent results by using different estimating techniques on various periods, such as those of Wang and Szirmai (2008), Chen, Jefferson, andZhang (2011), andBrandt, Tombe, andZhu (2013).…”

Promoting Private Entrepreneurship for Deepening Market Reform in China: A Resource Allocation Perspective

“…The rents would be much higher when taking into account the potential value of profitable projects for private entrepreneurs. There has long been recognition that the extent of capital market distortions would be significant (Young, 2000;Zhang and Tan, 2007;Brandt and Zhu, 2010;Brandt et al, 2013). Huang and Wang (2010) claim that distortions caused by government interventions are not confined to the capital markets, but are also in the labor and natural resource markets.…”