2014
DOI: 10.1002/rob.21548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Graph Modeling of Rigid‐body Dynamics for Localization, Mapping, and Parameter Estimation of a Spinning Object in Space

Abstract: This paper presents a new approach for solving the simultaneous localization and mapping problem for inspecting an unknown and uncooperative object that is spinning about an arbitrary axis in space. This approach probabilistically models the six degree-of-freedom rigid-body dynamics in a factor graph formulation. Using the incremental smoothing and mapping system, this method estimates a feature-based map of the target object, as well as this object's position, orientation, linear velocity, angular velocity, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few approaches such as [40][41][42] track features over time and employ simultaneous localization and mapping or structure-from-motion techniques to estimate the 3-D structure and dynamics of the target object. Pose is again computed by matching observed features to the estimated structure.…”
Section: A Monocular Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few approaches such as [40][41][42] track features over time and employ simultaneous localization and mapping or structure-from-motion techniques to estimate the 3-D structure and dynamics of the target object. Pose is again computed by matching observed features to the estimated structure.…”
Section: A Monocular Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This session used an inspector SPHERES satellite equipped with the VERTIGO Goggles to gather footage of a second tumbling SPHERES satellite. This data set was processed on the ground to create a three‐dimensional (3D) map and to estimate the state (linear and angular position and velocity) and inertial properties of the target satellite; this analysis is presented in Chapter 6 of Tweddle's Ph.D. thesis (Tweddle, ) and a forthcoming paper in the Journal of Field Robotics (Tweddle, Saenz‐Otereo, Leonard, & Miller, ). This test session also tested an algorithm for circumnavigation of the target satellite using only a depth map generated by the stereo cameras (Fourie et al., , ).…”
Section: Summary Of Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Tweddle's binocular vision method has achieved fast identification of space debris dynamics parameters. The angular velocity estimation error of Tweddle's method is less than 5 deg/s, the normalized principal moment of inertia error is less than 0.35, the inertial principal axis direction error is less than 12.1 deg, and the identification error of morphology is less than 1.14 cm [7,8]. It should be noted that most of the binocular vision methods are within this accuracy range as well (e.g., the normalized principal moments of inertia error for the Peasce method is less than 0.04 [13]).…”
Section: Feasibility Analysis Of Space Harpoonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the estimation of three-axis tumbling debris' dynamic parameters, the stereovision methods have been widely used. Tweddle et al [7,8] proposed a method to estimate the dynamic parameters of non-cooperative targets based on binocular vision. In this method, aiming at the space proximity operation [9], the rotation of space debris was modeled by the Euler-Poinsot model, and the estimation of parameters was regarded as SLAM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%